2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-018-1576-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of multi-pathway production chains and multi-criteria decision-making through sustainability evaluation: a biojet fuel production case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Product design decisions such as material selection may cause environmental impact (Sofia et al, 2019), and, therefore, it is important to permanently ponder about design improvement in the context of the environment (Vyhmeister et al 2018). Parameter-based tools have been used to evaluate the environmental performance of companies (De Benedetto and Klemeš 2009), allowing the visualization of different scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product design decisions such as material selection may cause environmental impact (Sofia et al, 2019), and, therefore, it is important to permanently ponder about design improvement in the context of the environment (Vyhmeister et al 2018). Parameter-based tools have been used to evaluate the environmental performance of companies (De Benedetto and Klemeš 2009), allowing the visualization of different scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability of the supply chain is also investigated in [13], especially in the energy sector, considering uncertain conditions and the material quality effect. Most of the research discusses multiple selection criteria, as in [14][15][16]. An analytic hierarchy process based multi-criteria model described in [14] and related to the renewable energy sector is based on the triple bottom line dimensions (social, economic and environmental).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analytic hierarchy process based multi-criteria model described in [14] and related to the renewable energy sector is based on the triple bottom line dimensions (social, economic and environmental). A three-phase methodology is proposed in [15], using MCDM to identify the criteria list for sustainable material assessment model, while a multi-objective optimization model is proposed in [16] given the many alternatives available today that allow materials to be transformed into valuable products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, social or socioeconomic impacts have only been analyzed in a generic and conceptual manner without a systematic methodology for empirical assessment. As a result, most of studies in literature have focused on evaluating environmental impacts (Cox et al, 2014;de Jong et al, 2017;Han et al, 2013), technical feasibility (Tongpun et al, 2019;Tzanetis et al, 2017;Vyhmeister et al, 2018), and economic competitiveness (Lu, 2018;Rutten et al, 2017;Vyhmeister et al, 2018) of aviation biofuel, while none has addressed its social or socioeconomic aspects in depth, as noticed by Kamali et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%