2003
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.810520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of microwave devices using 3-D finite elements and the design sensitivity of the frequency response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss properties 4 of low-fidelity antenna models obtained from coarse-discretization EM simulations, as well as described the design optimization procedure. In this procedure the response surface approximation model, initially constructed using solely low-fidelity model data, is gradually improved using the high-fidelity simulations accumulated during the optimization run, and blended with the initial response surface using co-Kriging.…”
Section: Antenna Design Using Co-krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We discuss properties 4 of low-fidelity antenna models obtained from coarse-discretization EM simulations, as well as described the design optimization procedure. In this procedure the response surface approximation model, initially constructed using solely low-fidelity model data, is gradually improved using the high-fidelity simulations accumulated during the optimization run, and blended with the initial response surface using co-Kriging.…”
Section: Antenna Design Using Co-krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such "tuning" process may take as much as a few weeks of work and involve numerous EM simulations. The EM-driven design cost can be reduced by exploiting adjoint sensitivity techniques [3], [4] that allow obtaining exact derivative information of the antenna responses with respect to the designable parameters at little or no extra computational cost [5]. Recently, adjoint sensitivity has become commercially available (e.g., [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, design automation is difficult because conventional optimization routines are prone to failure and require large number of simulations to converge [9], [10]. Design speedup can be achieved by exploiting adjoint sensitivity techniques [11], [12] available through some commercial EM solvers [13], [14]. Also, surrogate-based optimization (SBO) techniques [15] have been recently applied for compact UWB antenna design [16], [17], which seems to be a quite promising approach in handling this type of design tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of conventional techniques (such as gradient-based algorithms or derivative free methods, e.g., pattern search algorithms) require considerable number of objective function evaluations (and, associated EM simulations) to yield an optimized design [4]. Recent availability of adjoint sensitivity techniques [5,6] through certain commercial simulation software packages (e.g., [7,8]) revived interest in gradient optimization. On the other hand, surrogate-based optimization (SBO) techniques [9][10][11][12][13] allow for dramatic reduction of the design optimization costs by shifting most of the operations into cheap replacement models (surrogates).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%