1990
DOI: 10.1021/ac00212a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In k = A + Bth (12) Although in MECC small changes in the phase ratio may occur, due to the influence of organic modifiers on micelle structures, for methanol and urea a linear relationship was obtained between the logarithm of the retention factor and the concentration modifier in the background electrolyte, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Organic Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In k = A + Bth (12) Although in MECC small changes in the phase ratio may occur, due to the influence of organic modifiers on micelle structures, for methanol and urea a linear relationship was obtained between the logarithm of the retention factor and the concentration modifier in the background electrolyte, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Organic Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For each value of the elution window, the optimum retention factor, kopt, can be calculated by differentiating Eqn. (5) with respect to k [12,16]:…”
Section: Resolution Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several work which have been done to final the optimum conditions of this Nano Separation Technique 5,[8][9][10] .…”
Section: Nano Separation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…which differentiates the product of the last two terms in Equation 3 (7 ). Under neutral or acidic conditions, t mc /t 0 is 3-4 and k opt is 1.7-2.0.…”
Section: Controlling Selectivity and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%