2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02716704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of machining techniques — A retrospective and literature review

Abstract: In this paper an attempt is made to review the literature on optimizing machining parameters in turning processes. Various conventional techniques employed for machining optimization include geometric programming, geometric plus linear programming, goal programming, sequential unconstrained minimization technique, dynamic programming etc. The latest techniques for optimization include fuzzy logic, scatter search technique, genetic algorithm, Taguchi technique and response surface methodology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to minimize the number of runs or trials, optimize values of parameters, assess experimental error, make qualitative estimation of parameters, and to make inference regarding the effect of parameters on the characteristics of the process (Aggarwal and Singh, 2005), it is essential to adopt any of the techniques of design of experiment for the turning experiment. In this work the response surface methodology (RSM), based on central composite (CC) design of experiment (DOE), was selected for the modeling, prediction and optimization of a R and i V as functions of A, B and C in the turning experiment.…”
Section: Design and Analysis Of Experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to minimize the number of runs or trials, optimize values of parameters, assess experimental error, make qualitative estimation of parameters, and to make inference regarding the effect of parameters on the characteristics of the process (Aggarwal and Singh, 2005), it is essential to adopt any of the techniques of design of experiment for the turning experiment. In this work the response surface methodology (RSM), based on central composite (CC) design of experiment (DOE), was selected for the modeling, prediction and optimization of a R and i V as functions of A, B and C in the turning experiment.…”
Section: Design and Analysis Of Experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an obligation for processes to work properly in time and at all times, it is of necessity that machined component manufacturers adopt better approaches to ensure that high quality products and services are produced. This drive for quality, and sometimes performance, has motivated efforts leading to the search for optimization techniques, and a shift from the use of traditional to non-traditional techniques, such as reviewed in Aggarwal and Singh [1]), and in Kumar and Uppal [2]. Amongst the non-traditional techniques, the use of response surface methodology (RSM) has attracted the attention of many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques for optimizing cutting conditions can be divided into classical and modern techniques [11]. Classical techniques for optimizing machining conditions are derived from Taylor's tool life equation and include geometric programming, linear programming, goal programming, sequential unconstrained minimization technique and dynamic programming [11].…”
Section: Reverse Algorithm Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical techniques for optimizing machining conditions are derived from Taylor's tool life equation and include geometric programming, linear programming, goal programming, sequential unconstrained minimization technique and dynamic programming [11]. Modern techniques include fuzzy logic, scatter search technique, genetic algorithm, Taguchi technique and response surface methodology [11].…”
Section: Reverse Algorithm Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to select optimal cutting parameters, manufacturing to obtain optimal cutting parameters, manufacturing industries have depended on the use of handbook based information which leads to decrease in productivity due to suboptimal use of machining capability. This causes high manufacturing cost and low product quality (Aggarwal & Singh, 2005). Hence, there is a need of a systematic methodological tool for optimization of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%