2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5624-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of machining parameters in the abrasive waterjet turning of alumina ceramic based on the response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four key parameters were considered as the input variables namely; stand-off distance (S OD ), abrasive mass flow (A MF ), feed rate (F R ) and water pressure (W P ). The selection of these parameters was based on the rationale that their impact has been noted as significant on surface roughness in the reported literature [15][16][17][18]20]. Preliminary trials were also performed for selecting the appropriate levels of the selected control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four key parameters were considered as the input variables namely; stand-off distance (S OD ), abrasive mass flow (A MF ), feed rate (F R ) and water pressure (W P ). The selection of these parameters was based on the rationale that their impact has been noted as significant on surface roughness in the reported literature [15][16][17][18]20]. Preliminary trials were also performed for selecting the appropriate levels of the selected control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has been conducted in the past to understand the mechanism and to investigate the parametric effects in AWJM with respect to surface roughness. For instance, Babu et al [15] have found that water pressure (W P ) is the most contributing factor for R a during AWJM of brass-360. Uthayakumar et al [16] also reported that W P was the prominent factor affecting the surface morphology of Ni-based super alloy cut by abrasive water jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the quadratic polynomial response surface model [30][31][32] was used, and the relationship between ξ and h can be written as:…”
Section: Analysis Of the Response Surface Function Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the different fluid contents, water jet cutting can be divided into pure water jet cutting (WJ) and abrasive water jet cutting (AWJ). Compared to traditional cutting technologies, AWJ offers the following advantages: negligible thermal effects, small machining force, good working conditions and environment, long tool life, high flexibility, and high machining versatility (Yue et al 2014). Currently, AWJ is widely used in various industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%