2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of large amorphous silicon and silica structures for molecular dynamics simulations of energetic impacts

Abstract: A practical method to create optimized amorphous silicon and silica structures for molecular dynamics simulations is developed and tested. The method is based on the Wooten, Winer, and Weaire algorithm and combination of small optimized blocks to larger structures. The method makes possible to perform simulations of either very large cluster hypervelocity impacts on amorphous targets or small displacements induced by low energy ion impacts in silicon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our MD simulation environment consists of an amorphous, 20×20×10 nm 3 Si target consisting of 219,488 atoms, with slab boundary conditions (free boundary in the incoming ion direction, and periodic boundaries in the other two lateral directions) 30 . The target itself was created using the Wooten/Winer/Weaire method 31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our MD simulation environment consists of an amorphous, 20×20×10 nm 3 Si target consisting of 219,488 atoms, with slab boundary conditions (free boundary in the incoming ion direction, and periodic boundaries in the other two lateral directions) 30 . The target itself was created using the Wooten/Winer/Weaire method 31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the additional terms describe the effect of surface curvature on the purely-erosive zeroth moment M (0) , adoption has tended to depend on the energy studied and simulation method used. Studies at higher energies using the BCA now regularly include the terms, 92,[116][117][118][119] because they seem to contribute meaningfully to the coefficients c 11 (h) and c 22 (h) at those energies, and some BCA codes readily allow the simulation of ion impacts on curved targets. On the other hand, studies at lower energies using MD may still omit the terms, 111,115,116 because of the complexity of creating relaxed amorphous targets with varying curvatures, and because erosive effects are not particularly strong at such energies.…”
Section: B Parameter Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in principle these moments describe the topography at small scales, they can be incorporated into continuum models to describe the surface morphology at much larger scales. This in turn allows to provide estimates for many of the parameters of these large-scale formulations [188,[130][131][132][133]189]. Hence, this formalism represents a multiscale approach to connect atomistic MD simulations to the continuum models which will be reviewed in the next section.…”
Section: From MD To Continuum Models (Crater Function Approach)mentioning
confidence: 99%