Optimization of lapping process parameters of CP-Ti based on PSO with mutation and BPNN

Abstract

This work aims to improve the surface quality of commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) with free alumina lapping fluid and establish the relationship between the main process parameters of lapping and roughness. On this basis, the optimal process parameters were searched by performing particle swarm optimization with mutation. First, free alumina lapping fluid was used to perform an L9(33) orthogonal experiment on CP-Ti to acquire data samples to train the neural network. At the same time, a BP neural network was created to fit the nonlinear functional relation among the lapping pressure P, spindle speed n, slurry flow Q and roughness Ra. Then, the range of the node numbers in the hidden layer of the neural network was determined by empirical formulas and the Kolmogorov theorem. On this basis, particle swarm optimization with mutation was used to search for the optimal process parameter configurations for lapping CP-Ti. The optimal process parameter configurations were used in the neural network to calculate the prediction value. Finally, the accuracy of the prediction was verified experimentally. The optimum process parameter configurations found by particle swarm optimization were as follows: the lapping pressure was 5 kPa, spindle speed was 60 r·min− 1 and slurry flow was 50 ml·min− 1. Then, the configurations were applied to a neural network to simulate prediction: the roughness was 0.1127 µm. The roughness obtained by experiments was 0.1134 µm. The error was 0.62%, which indicates that the well-trained neural network can achieve a good prediction when experimental data are missing. Applying the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm with mutation to a neural network will obtain the optimal process parameter configurations, which can effectively improve the surface quality of CP-Ti lapped with free abrasive.

A Change Detection Method for Remote Sensing Images Based on Coupled Dictionary and Deep Learning

“…e differential feature extraction network was composed of three fully connected layers (fc 1 , fc 2 , and fc 3 ). e range of the numbers in the hidden layer of the differential feature extraction network was determined by empirical formulas and Kolmogorov theorem [38]. e number of nodes was set to 150, 100, and 1, respectively.…”