2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of label-free DNA detection with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using PNA probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reports attribute the observed change in the impedimetric response to the sensing film structure and the resulting conformational/structural changes which occur on the surfaces of electrodes with different geometries 27 . In this study, the protocol used to prepare the sensor surface resulted in a film conformation which caused an increase in R CT following target binding, which was in keeping with previous macroelectrode studies where increases in R CT were attributed to the target DNA blocking pinholes and increasing electrostatic repulsion at the electrode surface, ultimately causing a decrease in the exchange current density 28 .…”
Section: Page 4 Of 13 Analystsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These reports attribute the observed change in the impedimetric response to the sensing film structure and the resulting conformational/structural changes which occur on the surfaces of electrodes with different geometries 27 . In this study, the protocol used to prepare the sensor surface resulted in a film conformation which caused an increase in R CT following target binding, which was in keeping with previous macroelectrode studies where increases in R CT were attributed to the target DNA blocking pinholes and increasing electrostatic repulsion at the electrode surface, ultimately causing a decrease in the exchange current density 28 .…”
Section: Page 4 Of 13 Analystsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…43,44 The covalent insertion of metals into the PNA capture probe seems an interesting alternative to avoid the addition of indicators. The main advantages of such an alternative are the distinct and permanent label-strand bonding and the certainty about the location and the strand bonding of the probe.…”
Section: Pnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, EIS circumvents the labeling of at least one compound of the assay with, for example, enzymes, fluorophores, or redox reporters and can hence be considered as a label-free approach for detecting complementary recognition events at surfaces. [6][7][8][9] Therefore, EIS has been successfully applied for the detection of DNA conductivity, [10] DNA hybridization, [11][12][13][14][15] single-nucleotide mismatches in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), [16] in situ hybridization of PNA/DNA, [17] DNA and RNA replication, [18,19] and the interaction of metal ions with DNA. [20,21] DNA detection by means of EIS is based on the repulsion between the DNA-modified electrode and a free-diffusing redox reporter, typically [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3À/4À .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%