In the bioliq process, biomass is converted to gasoline over four steps including pyrolysis, synthesis gas (syngas) generation via gasification, gas cleaning, and gasoline synthesis via dimethyl ether (DME). This work aims to investigate the gasoline synthesis plant of the bioliq process and also alternative process routes for the conversion of biomass-derived syngas to gasoline via methanol (MeOH) and DME pathways by process simulation in Aspen Plus, using a syngas composition adapted from the bioliq plant and enhanced with makeup H 2 . The simulations were established using kinetic models for MeOH, DME, and water−gas shift (WGS) synthesis based on selected models from the literature and component yield models for MeOH/DME to gasoline (MTG/ DTG) reactions based on product characteristics from known gasoline synthesis plants. The selected process routes were compared regarding product mass and energetic efficiencies and H 2 and CO 2 balances. The results showed that an optimized bioliq process, i.e., biofuel synthesis via direct DME synthesis with a WGS unit for makeup H 2 supply, is efficient in terms of syngas conversion and gasoline productivity, although it has a drawback concerning CO 2 generation. For this process, the mass and chemical energy efficiencies of gasoline based on syngas were calculated to be approximately 15 and 65%, respectively. Comparatively, for the similar process via the MeOH pathway, these efficiencies were found to be 11 and 50%, respectively. The CO and H 2 conversion rates for gasoline synthesis via DME were found to be about 77 and 64%, respectively, whereas via MeOH, they were obtained as ca. 48 and 28%, respectively. Additionally, the optimized process was scaled up for production of 100,000 tons/year gasoline and evaluated based on mass and chemical energy and CO 2 and element (hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen) balances. Here, the mass and chemical energy efficiencies of gasoline based on biomass feed were calculated to be 13 and 35%, respectively.