SAE Technical Paper Series 2019
DOI: 10.4271/2019-28-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of In-Cylinder Flow and Swirl Generation Analysis for a Naturally Aspirated Diesel Genset Engine for Emission Reduction through Intake Port Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,13 However, it should be noted that the database used for training the ANN is commonly built by the numerical simulation results due to the cost, thus the accuracy of the numerical simulation is critical to the results of ports optimization, so a lot of research work on port simulation has been done by researchers. Table 1 gives the accuracy of the simulation results in the past decade, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] in which the T-port means tangential port and the H-port means helical port. In the previous work, 30,31 the simulation of intake ports mainly aimed to predict the flow coefficient, and the predicted result of swirl ratio was only used to reflect the changing trends along with the increased valve lifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,13 However, it should be noted that the database used for training the ANN is commonly built by the numerical simulation results due to the cost, thus the accuracy of the numerical simulation is critical to the results of ports optimization, so a lot of research work on port simulation has been done by researchers. Table 1 gives the accuracy of the simulation results in the past decade, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] in which the T-port means tangential port and the H-port means helical port. In the previous work, 30,31 the simulation of intake ports mainly aimed to predict the flow coefficient, and the predicted result of swirl ratio was only used to reflect the changing trends along with the increased valve lifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous work, 30,31 the simulation of intake ports mainly aimed to predict the flow coefficient, and the predicted result of swirl ratio was only used to reflect the changing trends along with the increased valve lifts. In the later work, [32][33][34][35][36] the prediction accuracy of the swirl ratio was improved under the medium and high valve lifts, but the prediction accuracy of the flow coefficient still cannot be accurately predicted. Besides, the same numerical simulation strategy had a great difference in the simulation results of different ports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%