2016
DOI: 10.12913/22998624/61931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of I-Section Profile Design by the Finite Element Method

Abstract: This paper discusses the problem of design optimization for an I-section profile. The optimization process was performed using the Abaqus program. The numerical analysis of a strictly static problem was based on the finite element method. The scope of the analysis involved both determination of stresses and displacements in the profile and structure topology optimization. The main focus of the numerical analysis was put on reducing profile volume while maintaining the same load and similar stresses prior to an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With further loading of the structure, the deformations corresponding to the lowest buckling modes increase. The post-critical load vs. deflection characteristics (P-u z ) remain stable, which confirms that the structure can carry the compressive load in spite of buckling [52][53][54][55][56][57], as shown in Figure 5. The experimental (testing machine) and numerical (FEM) characteristics are compared with the results of the AE signal energy-the results are plotted for the axial compression case and for extreme values of the load eccentricity applied in the two perpendicular directions e 1 and e 2 .…”
Section: Composite Materials Damage Initiationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…With further loading of the structure, the deformations corresponding to the lowest buckling modes increase. The post-critical load vs. deflection characteristics (P-u z ) remain stable, which confirms that the structure can carry the compressive load in spite of buckling [52][53][54][55][56][57], as shown in Figure 5. The experimental (testing machine) and numerical (FEM) characteristics are compared with the results of the AE signal energy-the results are plotted for the axial compression case and for extreme values of the load eccentricity applied in the two perpendicular directions e 1 and e 2 .…”
Section: Composite Materials Damage Initiationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Earlier, Allen et al worked on a few aluminum alloys and recommended a valuable relationship between tensile strength, hardness and electrical conductivity for 7079-T6, 7178-T6, 7075-T6, and 7002-T6 only. No such relation was found for other types of aluminum alloys [25][26][27]. Hagemaier reported that it was possible to find out the actual residual yield strength of 2024-T3/T4 and 7075-T6 alloys using hardness and electrical conductivity measurements [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing structures, it is important that undesirable phenomena of material failure caused by loads are prevented, and if they occur, it is crucial to predict areas where failure propagation begins. There are numerous studies [4,5,[11][12][13][14][15][16] on crack propagation processes and the use of the xFEM method. The innovative character of this method stems from the fact that the simulation of crack initiation and propagation processes runs independently of the applied FEM mesh type and density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%