2017 6th ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ict-ispc.2017.8075310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of green building design to achieve green building index (GBI) using genetic algorithm (GA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another envelope optimization initiative was recorded by in [8], where a genetic algorithm mono-objective was developed to optimize an environmentally friendly building projected by BIM technology, seeking to find a greater combination of construction material that produces an OTTV (General Thermal Transfer Value) and an envelope energy performance indicator closest to the ideal as possible. The initial result showed that the genetic algorithm could find an ideal combination of materials with a reduced OTTV of 16%.…”
Section: Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another envelope optimization initiative was recorded by in [8], where a genetic algorithm mono-objective was developed to optimize an environmentally friendly building projected by BIM technology, seeking to find a greater combination of construction material that produces an OTTV (General Thermal Transfer Value) and an envelope energy performance indicator closest to the ideal as possible. The initial result showed that the genetic algorithm could find an ideal combination of materials with a reduced OTTV of 16%.…”
Section: Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many multi-objective optimisation (MOO) algorithms, which have different types of approach, and most of them require at least two conflicting objective functions to operate [41], [42]. This study employed an elitism MOO algorithm called non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), which was developed by Deb et al [43].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi objective optimization (MOO) has more complex implementations and constraints compared to single objective optimization. There are many MOO algorithms which has different types of approach, and most of them require at least two conflicting objective functions to operate [18,19].…”
Section: Multi Objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%