2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of furrow irrigation performance of sugarcane fields based on inflow and geometric parameters using WinSRFR in Southwest of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure (17) shows the irrigation efficiency of the current design of the RB100 system and the best techniques for maximizing furrow length and width that have achieved the highest irrigation performance. These management techniques have enabled PAEmin to increase from 68% to 69, 71, 72, and 73% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m, and DUmin to increase from 68% to 86, 85, 83 and 82% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m, and to reduce DP from 32% to 12, 13, 15 and 16% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m. The increase in PAE and DU by reducing field length under furrow irrigation closely corresponds to the results found by (Mazarei et al, 2020) who stated that decreased furrow length leads to an increase in the value of the objective function (including application efficiency, distribution uniformity and deep percolation). Optimizing irrigation performance for Flat-Basin By optimizing the existing basin sizes for the available inflow rate and cut-off time, the irrigation performance can be improved as shown in Table (5).…”
Section: Optimizing Irrigation Performance For Rb130 CMsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure (17) shows the irrigation efficiency of the current design of the RB100 system and the best techniques for maximizing furrow length and width that have achieved the highest irrigation performance. These management techniques have enabled PAEmin to increase from 68% to 69, 71, 72, and 73% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m, and DUmin to increase from 68% to 86, 85, 83 and 82% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m, and to reduce DP from 32% to 12, 13, 15 and 16% for furrow widths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 m, respectively, at furrow lengths of 12 m. The increase in PAE and DU by reducing field length under furrow irrigation closely corresponds to the results found by (Mazarei et al, 2020) who stated that decreased furrow length leads to an increase in the value of the objective function (including application efficiency, distribution uniformity and deep percolation). Optimizing irrigation performance for Flat-Basin By optimizing the existing basin sizes for the available inflow rate and cut-off time, the irrigation performance can be improved as shown in Table (5).…”
Section: Optimizing Irrigation Performance For Rb130 CMsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These strategies may be a decrease in the flow rate and its time of application. According to (Mazarei et al, 2020), it is easy for growers to adjust flow discharge and cutoff time compared to soil properties modification and field design.…”
Section: Optimizing Irrigation Performance With Operation Analysis Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], found that, optimizing irrigation e ciency can be possible through changes in irrigation operation and eld design, which may lead water saving by reducing deep drainage losses and can enhance the e ciency of the system. [25,37], reported that application e ciency of the system can be increased by shortening the eld length and decreasing of the in ow rate. [32] also stated that e cient furrow irrigation can be ensured by selecting proper combination of decision variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Alberto et al (2011Alberto et al ( , 2014 ; Arif et al (2012); Cesari de Maria et al (2016); Masseroni, et al (2017); Sharda et al (2017). 5 Horst et al (2007); Gonçalves et al (2011); Du et al (2013); Mazarei et al (2020). 6 Humpherys (1989,1995); Trout and Kincaid (1989); Niblack and Sanchez (2008); Arnold et al (2015); Masseroni et al (2017).…”
Section: Introduction and Concepts Of Water Use And Water Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%