2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9076-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of electrostatic sensor electrodes using particle swarm optimization technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the observed results, electrical field interaction was less in 15 cm separation in comparison to 5 and 10 cm separations, while the cross-correlation coefficient in 15 cm separation was more than the case of 20 cm separation. Consequently, the optimal value of sensor separation between two electrodes is 15 cm because of low electrical field interaction and low statistical error, and the optimal value of length and thickness of electrode have been, respectively, selected as 0.6 and 0.5 cm referring to the literature (Heydarianasl and Rahmat, 2017) and present experimentations for achieving maximum spatial sensitivity and minimum statistical error. As mentioned earlier, electrical field interaction leads to reduced signal similarity (Ma and Yan, 2000), as shown in these figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the observed results, electrical field interaction was less in 15 cm separation in comparison to 5 and 10 cm separations, while the cross-correlation coefficient in 15 cm separation was more than the case of 20 cm separation. Consequently, the optimal value of sensor separation between two electrodes is 15 cm because of low electrical field interaction and low statistical error, and the optimal value of length and thickness of electrode have been, respectively, selected as 0.6 and 0.5 cm referring to the literature (Heydarianasl and Rahmat, 2017) and present experimentations for achieving maximum spatial sensitivity and minimum statistical error. As mentioned earlier, electrical field interaction leads to reduced signal similarity (Ma and Yan, 2000), as shown in these figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed mathematical model to calculate the equation of spatial sensitivity of circular-and quarter-ring electrode was stated in literature (Heydarianasl and Rahmat, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have been applied different methods including FEM [14,15], GA [3], ANSYS [3], and PSO [4] to optimize electrostatic sensor electrodes. MOPSO has been examined as a new approach in this study due to its advantages including simplicity, high accuracy, and good performance.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason to optimize electrostatic sensor is that reducing discrepancy between the measured correlation velocity and true mean particle velocity to obtain uniform spatial sensitivity. For these relatively, optimization methods have been studied in terms of fundamental characteristics of electrostatic sensor in several configurations [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) is a swarm intelligence based algorithm to find a solution to an optimisation problem in a search space, or model, and predict social behaviour in the presence of objectives as well as sharing many similarities with evolutionary computation techniques [19]. Furthermore, each particle of the PSO flies in the search area with a velocity based on its own previous ideal solution.…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%