2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of dose selection using multiple surrogates of toxicity as a continuous variable in phase I cancer trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the number of shale oil wells on Eagle Ford Shale Play can be as large as 6000 [31]. As for the pharmaceutical industry, in phase I cancer clinical trials, the number of cancer patients N may be strictly confined to 25 [141], but for phase III trials for non-oncology drug studies, N can be as large as 2000 [142].…”
Section: Statistical Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the number of shale oil wells on Eagle Ford Shale Play can be as large as 6000 [31]. As for the pharmaceutical industry, in phase I cancer clinical trials, the number of cancer patients N may be strictly confined to 25 [141], but for phase III trials for non-oncology drug studies, N can be as large as 2000 [142].…”
Section: Statistical Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen the great success of Bayesian nonlinear mixed effects models, or more generally, Bayesian hierarchical models (BHM), in a variety of disciplines such as biology, medical research, physics, social, and educational sciences [30,31,141,298,299]. This was partly due to the widespread introduction of non-commercial software packages that enabled applied researchers to answer substantive research questions through applications of BHM [17,34,35,47,50,77].…”
Section: Software Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other motivation is that various continuous measures of toxicity arise during phase I studies, which can be beneficial for examining dose-response relationships more precisely. For example, if one aims to consider all grades of toxicities from multiple adverse events when allocating doses, it may be necessary to derive a continuous toxicity score, such as the normalized equivalent toxicity score [14,15], or use a weighted average form as discussed by [16], and utilize such scores as the continuous toxicity response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One drawback of EWOC-NETS is that the dose-finding does not follow the fully Bayesian paradigm, thus failing to describe the uncertainty of the MTD in a fully Bayesian manner. More recently, Lee et al [16] introduced a fully Bayesian design based on constrained linear regression, called the two-parameter linear dosefinder. In this design, the authors aimed to leverage all grade information of toxicities according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) [37] within a fully Bayesian framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation