2012
DOI: 10.2507/ijsimm11(2)1.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of cutting inserts geometry using DEFORM-3D: Numerical simulation and experimental validation

Abstract: In this research work an attempt has been made to minimize flank wear of uncoated carbide inserts while machining AISI 1045 steel by finite element analysis. Tool wear is the predominant factor that causes poor surface finish and is responsible for the dimensional accuracy of the machined surface. The quality of component produced decides the effectiveness and competitiveness of any manufacturing industry. In this analysis, the effect of tool geometries on performance measures of flank wear, surface roughness … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be divided into systematic errors and random errors. While systematic errors can be measured and modelled to reduce their influence using compensation methods, random errors are measured in order to avoid their influence but without compensating them [1][2][3]. The sources of errors can be classified in relation to their origin as dynamic effects [4], static load and motion control effects [5], thermal effects [6,7] and kinematic/geometric errors [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be divided into systematic errors and random errors. While systematic errors can be measured and modelled to reduce their influence using compensation methods, random errors are measured in order to avoid their influence but without compensating them [1][2][3]. The sources of errors can be classified in relation to their origin as dynamic effects [4], static load and motion control effects [5], thermal effects [6,7] and kinematic/geometric errors [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface quality, respectively surface roughness, has an important influence on technological time and costs, i. e. productivity [8]. On this basis, many scientificresearch projects and scientific papers of experimental investigations which are largely based on previously conducted and planned experiments aim at optimizing cutting parameters, modelling and predicting surface roughness to obtain a desired level of surface quality of machined products [9]. In this sense, many statistical (regression) models and models based on the application of artificial intelligence models have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element model of the milling process was designed to determine the residual stress distribution across the depth of the machined surface. Tamizharasan and Senthil Kumar [14] attempted to minimize flank wear of uncoated carbide inserts by finite element modelling and simulation. The effect of tool geometries on performance measures of flank wear, surface roughness and cutting forces generated were evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%