1969
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1969.1099173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of control systems with discontinuities and terminal constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is possible to derive a continuous linear feedback law [24] similar to those neighboring optimum feedback laws which are obtained using the backward sweep method to solve the linear boundary value problem (see e.g. [3], [21], [22], [23], Dyer, McReynolds [8], and Wood [31]). Because of the numerical instability, the use of such feedback laws is not recommended.…”
Section: Si~- C ~ Si B Cbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is possible to derive a continuous linear feedback law [24] similar to those neighboring optimum feedback laws which are obtained using the backward sweep method to solve the linear boundary value problem (see e.g. [3], [21], [22], [23], Dyer, McReynolds [8], and Wood [31]). Because of the numerical instability, the use of such feedback laws is not recommended.…”
Section: Si~- C ~ Si B Cbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neighboring optimal control (NOC) algorithms provide the simplicity we desire in the final guidance algorithm while also providing an approximate optimal solution to the underlying optimal control problem of interest. In early works [10]- [16] it is found that the solution of the NOC or second-variation control law is very similar to the solution algorithms which are used to solve the LQR problems. Solution algorithms use modified versions of the backward sweep [l]- [2] method to generate the required time-varying gain functions.…”
Section: The Linear Quadratic Regulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Inertial properties Table 5.5 Constant parameters Table 5.6 Aerodynamic coefficients Table 5.7 Solutions with control-rate constraints Table 5.8 Solutions with acceleration constraints Table 5.9 Closed-loop performance with altitude dispersions Table 5.10 Closed-loop robustness with altitude dispersions 129 Table 5.11 Performance: solutions with flight path angle dispersions .... 136 Table 5.12 Robustness: solutions with flight path angle dispersions 136 Table 5.13 Performance: solutions with pitch attitude dispersions Table 5.14 Robustness: solutions with pitch attitude dispersions Table 5.15 Closed-loop performance: minimum-norm update Table 5. 16 Closed-loop performance: first-order update 144 Table 5.17 Performance of minimum-norm update; 2(to) + 100 144 Table 5. 18 Performance of first-order update; z{to) -|-100 Table 5.19…”
Section: Graduate Collegementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations