Abstract:We recommend administration of 150 ml of iohexol as the optimal amount of contrast material for single phase bolus administration in emergency helical CT examination of the chest and abdomen.
“…Densities were measured in all patients and served as secondary end-points and were determined by measuring vessel attenuation (in Hounsfield units, HU) in regions of interest (ROIs) that were placed in the ascending, descending, and abdominal aorta and covered a maximum of the vessel lumen (<1 cm 2 ). Ten regions including both arteries and veins were measured in each patient, and in addition, standard deviation of background noise was assessed [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The densities of parenchymal organs were measured by placing ROIs in the right and left lobes of the liver, in the spleen, and in the kidneys covering the largest possible area within the parenchyma but without including vessels, artifacts, or lesions (in the slice measured and in both adjacent slices, <3 cm 2 ) [6]. Density was measured in the lesion of patients with liver and spleen lacerations (n=10) and compared to artifacts caused by the arms at the side of the body (n=25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomy appears less delineated show that injection protocols with more than just one injection phase are advantageous compared to protocols that use a single injection phase. Bolus tracking is recommended for the upper abdomen [15], but not in patients with multiple trauma because of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6]. Instead, a fixed time delay using an amount of 150 mL seems to be the method of choice [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different lesions, usually evaluated in different phases of contrast distribution, have to be illustrated: e.g., hematoma and ongoing arterial hemorrhage have to be distinguished, and parenchymal contusion or laceration of organs have to be depicted. A high dose of contrast media is generally accepted for adult multiple-trauma patients [6]. However, the administration of contrast medium is difficult because bolus tracking is often inadequate following multiple trauma on account of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high dose of contrast media is generally accepted for adult multiple-trauma patients [6]. However, the administration of contrast medium is difficult because bolus tracking is often inadequate following multiple trauma on account of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6].…”
To evaluate a triphasic injection protocol for whole-body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with multiple trauma. Fifty consecutive patients (41 men) were examined. Contrast medium (300 mg/mL iodine) was injected starting with 70 mL at 3 mL/s, followed by 0.1 mL/s for 8 s, and by another bolus of 75 mL at 4 mL/s. CT data acquisition started 50 s after the beginning of the first injection. Two experienced, blinded readers independently measured the density in all major arteries, veins, and parenchymatous organs. Image quality was assessed using a five-point ordinal rating scale and compared to standard injection protocols [n = 25 each for late arterial chest, portovenous abdomen, and MDCT angiography (CTA)]. With the exception of the infrarenal inferior caval vein, all blood vessels were depicted with diagnostic image quality using the multiple-trauma protocol. Arterial luminal density was slightly but significantly smaller compared to CTA (P< 0.01). Veins and parenchymatous organs were opacified significantly better compared to all other protocols (P < 0.01). Arm artifacts reduced the density of spleen and liver parenchyma significantly (P < 0.01). Similarly high image quality is achieved for arteries using the multiple-trauma protocol compared to CTA, and parenchymatous organs are depicted with better image quality compared to specialized protocols. Arm artifacts should be avoided.
“…Densities were measured in all patients and served as secondary end-points and were determined by measuring vessel attenuation (in Hounsfield units, HU) in regions of interest (ROIs) that were placed in the ascending, descending, and abdominal aorta and covered a maximum of the vessel lumen (<1 cm 2 ). Ten regions including both arteries and veins were measured in each patient, and in addition, standard deviation of background noise was assessed [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The densities of parenchymal organs were measured by placing ROIs in the right and left lobes of the liver, in the spleen, and in the kidneys covering the largest possible area within the parenchyma but without including vessels, artifacts, or lesions (in the slice measured and in both adjacent slices, <3 cm 2 ) [6]. Density was measured in the lesion of patients with liver and spleen lacerations (n=10) and compared to artifacts caused by the arms at the side of the body (n=25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomy appears less delineated show that injection protocols with more than just one injection phase are advantageous compared to protocols that use a single injection phase. Bolus tracking is recommended for the upper abdomen [15], but not in patients with multiple trauma because of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6]. Instead, a fixed time delay using an amount of 150 mL seems to be the method of choice [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different lesions, usually evaluated in different phases of contrast distribution, have to be illustrated: e.g., hematoma and ongoing arterial hemorrhage have to be distinguished, and parenchymal contusion or laceration of organs have to be depicted. A high dose of contrast media is generally accepted for adult multiple-trauma patients [6]. However, the administration of contrast medium is difficult because bolus tracking is often inadequate following multiple trauma on account of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high dose of contrast media is generally accepted for adult multiple-trauma patients [6]. However, the administration of contrast medium is difficult because bolus tracking is often inadequate following multiple trauma on account of the circulatory instability present in most cases [2,6].…”
To evaluate a triphasic injection protocol for whole-body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with multiple trauma. Fifty consecutive patients (41 men) were examined. Contrast medium (300 mg/mL iodine) was injected starting with 70 mL at 3 mL/s, followed by 0.1 mL/s for 8 s, and by another bolus of 75 mL at 4 mL/s. CT data acquisition started 50 s after the beginning of the first injection. Two experienced, blinded readers independently measured the density in all major arteries, veins, and parenchymatous organs. Image quality was assessed using a five-point ordinal rating scale and compared to standard injection protocols [n = 25 each for late arterial chest, portovenous abdomen, and MDCT angiography (CTA)]. With the exception of the infrarenal inferior caval vein, all blood vessels were depicted with diagnostic image quality using the multiple-trauma protocol. Arterial luminal density was slightly but significantly smaller compared to CTA (P< 0.01). Veins and parenchymatous organs were opacified significantly better compared to all other protocols (P < 0.01). Arm artifacts reduced the density of spleen and liver parenchyma significantly (P < 0.01). Similarly high image quality is achieved for arteries using the multiple-trauma protocol compared to CTA, and parenchymatous organs are depicted with better image quality compared to specialized protocols. Arm artifacts should be avoided.
There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to justify promotion of ultrasound-based clinical pathways in diagnosing patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.