2007
DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of concentration control by evolution strategies: Formulation, application, and assessment of remedial solutions

Abstract: [1] The uniqueness and mathematical complexity of typical groundwater remediation or control problems involving numerical models necessitate appropriate solvers that find optimal solutions reliably and within reasonable computational time. The aim of this paper is to introduce an innovative evolutionary algorithm, the evolution strategies with covariance matrix adaptation and rank m update (CMA-ES), used as an external solver in combination with groundwater transport models. A broad range of hypothetical pumpa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied calibration scheme is based on the parameter estimation tool PEST (Doherty, ). The current calibration utilizes the global optimization scheme within PEST based on covariance matrix adaptation estimation strategies (CMA‐ES) as introduced by Hansen and Ostermeier () and later applied by Bayer and Finkel () to calibrate a groundwater model against concentration. The CMA‐ES utilizes a stochastic sampling approach based on updated probability fields and has proven very efficient in comparison with other stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model calibrations both regarding convergence speed and finding the lowest minimum (Arsenault, Poulin, Cote, & Brissette, ).…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied calibration scheme is based on the parameter estimation tool PEST (Doherty, ). The current calibration utilizes the global optimization scheme within PEST based on covariance matrix adaptation estimation strategies (CMA‐ES) as introduced by Hansen and Ostermeier () and later applied by Bayer and Finkel () to calibrate a groundwater model against concentration. The CMA‐ES utilizes a stochastic sampling approach based on updated probability fields and has proven very efficient in comparison with other stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model calibrations both regarding convergence speed and finding the lowest minimum (Arsenault, Poulin, Cote, & Brissette, ).…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the CMAES guided search in the parameter space makes the algorithm less computationally demanding than other global optimization approaches, which enumerate a large number of possible solutions (e.g. Monte CarloMarkov chain methods) (Bayer and Finkel, 2007). In order to keep computational demands low and to avoid overfitting by a very small sample size, we perform calibration for a subset of 1000 randomly chosen grid cells.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving the MINLP problem by gradient-based optimization algorithms would be very complicated because the solution needs combinatorial optimization algorithms. Genetic algorithms or evolutionary algorithms are derivative-free algorithms and have been proven to be efficient optimization approaches for groundwater remediation problems involving integer variables (McKinney and Lin 1994; Guan and Aral 1999;Park and Aral 2004;Bayer and Finkel 2004;Bayer and Finkel 2007;Singh and Minsker 2008). This study employs a GA with binary chromosomes to search for the pump rates and the binary values of the scheduling variables.…”
Section: ……… ………mentioning
confidence: 99%