2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Combinatorial Mutagenesis

Abstract: Protein engineering by combinatorial site-directed mutagenesis evaluates a portion of the sequence space near a target protein, seeking variants with improved properties (e.g., stability, activity, immunogenicity). In order to improve the hit-rate of beneficial variants in such mutagenesis libraries, we develop methods to select optimal positions and corresponding sets of the mutations that will be used, in all combinations, in constructing a library for experimental evaluation. Our approach, OCoM (Optimizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It significantly extends structurebased protein design by accounting for the complementary goal of immunogenicity. It likewise significantly extends our previous work on Pareto optimization for protein engineering in general (Zheng et al, 2009, He et al, 2012 and for deimmunization in particular, which assessed effects on structure and function only according to a sequence potential (Parker et al, 2010;Parker et al, 2011a, Parker et al, 2011b. Inspired by an approach for optimization of stability and specificity of interacting proteins (Grigoryan et al, 2009), we employ a sweep algorithm that minimizes the energy of the design target at decreasing predicted epitope scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It significantly extends structurebased protein design by accounting for the complementary goal of immunogenicity. It likewise significantly extends our previous work on Pareto optimization for protein engineering in general (Zheng et al, 2009, He et al, 2012 and for deimmunization in particular, which assessed effects on structure and function only according to a sequence potential (Parker et al, 2010;Parker et al, 2011a, Parker et al, 2011b. Inspired by an approach for optimization of stability and specificity of interacting proteins (Grigoryan et al, 2009), we employ a sweep algorithm that minimizes the energy of the design target at decreasing predicted epitope scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The epitope score counts the number of peptide-allele hits at a standard 5% threshold. Libraries are designed by simultaneously selecting residue positions and degenerate oligonucleotides from a set of allowed positions and position-specific mutational choices derived from the sequence analysis (excluding mutations to/from proline and cysteine) (53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Parker and colleagues (27), it follows from the NPhardness of the protein design problem (28) that the design of degenerate sequences varying non-independently at multiple positions is NP-hard. This finding holds whether designing a single template or multiple degenerate templates.…”
Section: • Instancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of groups have developed computational methods to maximize the number of desired target sequences created using DCs under a user-specified library size. Unfortunately, this problem is NP-hard (27,28), meaning that a fast (polynomial time) algorithmic solution is extremely unlikely to exist. Instead, researchers have had to rely on a variety of heuristics or relaxations of the problem to develop algorithms that efficiently design DC libraries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation