2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3735831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of CNN Model With Hyper Parameter Tuning for Enhancing Sturdiness in Classification of Histopathological Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In task-specific applications, there barely exists a definite method to find the number of layers or amount of neurons required in each layer for training the model. The selection of few parameters is based on our previous work in [ 49 ], and we found that the training to test the ratio of the dataset is fixed to 80 : 20 for a batch size of 32 with 500 epochs throughout the experiment. Initialization of the network weights is done using the Gaussian distribution with a low standard deviation for all the layers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In task-specific applications, there barely exists a definite method to find the number of layers or amount of neurons required in each layer for training the model. The selection of few parameters is based on our previous work in [ 49 ], and we found that the training to test the ratio of the dataset is fixed to 80 : 20 for a batch size of 32 with 500 epochs throughout the experiment. Initialization of the network weights is done using the Gaussian distribution with a low standard deviation for all the layers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the training starts with a high learning rate, and towards the end of training epochs, LR decays monotonically till the last epoch in both methods. Towards the end of training, for small learning rates, the gradient enters local minima and never escapes [ 49 ]. Table 4 shows the obtained values of performance metrics corresponding to the conventional learning strategies mentioned in Section 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…histopathology [62] and with biomedical imaging [63]. SIENNA demonstrates on average accuracy on clinical DICOM MRI data across 3 tasks of 92% (Non-Tumor, SD=5.5%), 91% (GBM, SD = 3.2%), and 93% (MET, SD = 2.6%), with the distribution of accuracies skewed higher to 100% and a lower bound at 75%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIENNA’s ability to identify meaningful patterns and attributes is further enriched by adversarial training, [57,58] using images with subtle parameter distortion to exploit the model’s vulnerabilities and decision boundaries for re-optimization. Finally, we apply hyperparameter tuning [59,60] to SIENNA for robustness in diagnostic output, as has been demonstrated for CNN analysis applied in genetics [59], vision [61], histopathology [62] and with biomedical imaging [63]. SIENNA demonstrates on average accuracy on clinical DICOM MRI data across 3 tasks of 92% (Non-Tumor, SD=5.5%), 91% (GBM, SD = 3.2%), and 93% (MET, SD = 2.6%), with the distribution of accuracies skewed higher to 100% and a lower bound at 75%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies conducted in the field of classification systems for histopathological images of colorectal cancer [7,8], the use of deep-learning systems usually involves the use of standard parameters without a detailed analysis of the influence of the parameters, hyperparameters, and preprocessing stages of histopathological images on the behavior of the system. In this paper, we present a novel and comprehensive study on the influence on the classification performance of a classification system (Deep Learning-VGG19) for classifying histopathological images of colorectal cancer and show how an appropriate choice of these parameters can have an important impact on the accuracy of the classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%