1999
DOI: 10.1149/1.1391719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Chemical Bath‐Deposited Cadmium Sulfide on InP Using a Novel Sulfur Pretreatment

Abstract: A high density of electrically active interface states has hindered the development of InP-based insulated-gate technology. The poor electrical quality of native oxides has forced researchers to develop novel methods of surface passivation 1-3 and new techniques to deposit dielectric films without damaging the underlying substrate. [4][5][6] We have previously demonstrated that the electronic properties of metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) devices on InP can be improved markedly by the chemical bath depositi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most efficient solar cell was obtained under the optimum deposition time of 20 minutes (thickness, 20 nm). Above 20 minutes, higher CdS film thickness can cause an optical and interfacial barrier accelerating the charge recombination, as suggested by other studies …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most efficient solar cell was obtained under the optimum deposition time of 20 minutes (thickness, 20 nm). Above 20 minutes, higher CdS film thickness can cause an optical and interfacial barrier accelerating the charge recombination, as suggested by other studies …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Figure 4A as suggested by other studies. 29,30 The best resulting J-V curves of planar Sb 2 (S x Se 1-x ) 3 13 In contrast, using c-TiO 2 produces a PCE max of 0.79% with J sc = 11.62 mA cm −2 and V oc = 0.22 V compared with that of c-CdS J sc = 16.82 mA cm −2 and V oc = 0.45 V (PCE max of 3.99%). By using a multilayer electron buffer, the thickness of CdS layer was reduced from 70 to 20 nm, compared with that reported in planar Sb 2 (S x Se 1-x ) 3 solar cells with similar photovoltaic performance, 14 which is a key factor in the fabrication of nontoxic solar cells.…”
Section: Materials and Device Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural and optical properties of SPD CdS thin films depend on the parameters of relative concentration of the reactants for chemical reaction, thickness of the films, pH value of the aqueous solution and annealing temperature. In the SPD process, film growth occurs either 1) by an ion-by-ion condensation or 2) by adsorption of the colloidal particles of CdS on the substrate [1,2]. The chemically deposited CdS film was found to consist of a continuous film relating to the ion-by-ion deposition of CdS [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because CdS has high transparency, wide and direct band gap transition (2.42 eV), photoconductivity, high electron affinity and n-type conductivity. CdS can also be used in a lot of applications including electronic [2] and optoelectronic devices [3]. Undoped and doped CdS thin films have been reported using different methods: electrodeposition (ED) [4], spray pyrolysis (SP) [5], chemical bath deposition (CBD) [6], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [7], metal organic vapour phase epitaxy (MOVPE) [8], successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) [9], and physical vapour deposition (PVD) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%