Optimization of cervical cage and analysis of its base material: A finite element study

Abstract

Nowadays, cervical disorders are common due to human lifestyles. Accordingly, the cage design should be optimized as an essential issue. For an optimal design, an objective function is utilized to calculate the proper geometrical parameters. Additionally, the base material of the cage plays a key role in its functionality and final cost. Novel materials are currently introduced with more compatibility with the bone in terms of mechanical and chemical properties. In this study, a cervical cage was modeled based on PEEK material with three types of tooth designs on its surface. The cervical cage is assumed to be implanted between C6 and C7 vertebrae. The geometric parameters of the cage were optimized to minimize the mass by determining allowable stress and subsidence. The effect of complete cortical removal was investigated as a surgical mistake. Finally, a new composition of PEEK/titanium was introduced as the base material of the cage. Ansys 18.2 was used for FEA. The cage with a straight tooth was chosen due to its lower stress and subsidence compared with other designs. Furthermore, the optimized structures of all three tooth designs were determined. The mass and volume of the optimal cages were reduced by 41.47% and 41.52% respectively. Besides, complete cortical resection should not be carried out during fusion surgery, since it may lead to higher subsidence. The composition of PEEK/titanium was chosen as an appropriate base material due to its better performance compared with PEEK or titanium alone.

Elucidation of the Mechanism of Occasional Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Rupture with Posterior Correction Procedure for Adult Spinal Deformity Using LLIF–Finite Element Analysis of the Impact of the Lordotic Angle of Intervertebral LLIF Cage

“…The spring constant was set to 100 N/mm. The coefficient of friction between the end plate and OLIF cage was set to 0.5 referring to a previously reported paper with similar conditions [ 31 ] ( Figure 2 A). This model does not treat cortical bone and cancellous bone separately.…”