2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-7893-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of CdO nanoparticles by Zr4+ doping for better photocatalytic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we note that, in as‐cleaved sample, Cd‐4d 5/2 has a binding energy (BE) of 10.87 eV, higher than the value previously reported (10.40–10.54 eV). We notice that the latter values instead coincide with BE of Cd‐4d in CdO . We observe also a doublet with Cd‐4d 5/2 at 11.50 eV with weak intensity (5% of total area) and an additional feature (5% of the total area) at 9.70 eV, which is possibly coming from a small amount of carbon contamination in the sample (Figure S8, Supporting Information), as expected for components at low BE, ascribable to weakly bonded species .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…First, we note that, in as‐cleaved sample, Cd‐4d 5/2 has a binding energy (BE) of 10.87 eV, higher than the value previously reported (10.40–10.54 eV). We notice that the latter values instead coincide with BE of Cd‐4d in CdO . We observe also a doublet with Cd‐4d 5/2 at 11.50 eV with weak intensity (5% of total area) and an additional feature (5% of the total area) at 9.70 eV, which is possibly coming from a small amount of carbon contamination in the sample (Figure S8, Supporting Information), as expected for components at low BE, ascribable to weakly bonded species .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Finally, two diffraction lines at 2θ=33.07° and 38.34° were used to calculate the crystal size of CdO “Monteponite” (JCPDS # 5–0640) where a value between 44–66 nm was found for the crystallite size of CdO [28] . The XRD results of the formation of CdO and CdMoO 4 in the nanoscale, further, are consistent with previously published articles [29,30] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“… [28] The XRD results of the formation of CdO and CdMoO 4 in the nanoscale, further, are consistent with previously published articles. [ 29 , 30 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the calculation of physical parameters such as lattice constants (a, b, and c), crystallite size (D), interatomic spacings between two planes (d), unit-cell volume (v), dislocation density (d), and micro-strain (e) can be determined using equations reported in the literature. 48,49 The measured values are summarized in Table 1. It is concluded from the results that there is some variation in lattice parameters as well as in the unit cell volume of La 2 O 3 -C 60 nanocomposites identified due to the interaction of La 2 O 3 with C 60 , resulting from the shift of the diffraction peaks.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%