2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2006.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of bulk metallic glass forming compositions in Zr–Cu–Al system by thermodynamic modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the multicomponent systems, it is difficult to determine the phase diagram with all possible deep eutectics to identity the compositions that can form BMG. It is also observed from the previous study of the present authors [8] for the ternary system that the value of the product DH chem · DS r /k B (represented by the parameter P HS ) is maximum at the deep eutectic. The parameter P HS is the product of enthalpy due to chemical mixing and mismatch entropy normalized by the Boltzmann constant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, for the multicomponent systems, it is difficult to determine the phase diagram with all possible deep eutectics to identity the compositions that can form BMG. It is also observed from the previous study of the present authors [8] for the ternary system that the value of the product DH chem · DS r /k B (represented by the parameter P HS ) is maximum at the deep eutectic. The parameter P HS is the product of enthalpy due to chemical mixing and mismatch entropy normalized by the Boltzmann constant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[8] Further analysis on Zr-Cu-Al, Zr-Ni-Al, Zr-Cu-Ti, and Zr-Co-Al systems (Table I) showed for the best BMG formation with critical thickness (Z c (mm)) of 3 mm and above that the DS config /R ranges from 0.9 to 1.0. It is well known that metallic glasses are configurationally frozen supercooled liquids, and they are more prone to form at compositions near to deep eutectic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, as pointed out by Rao et al, 10) these quantitative parameters have not true predictive ability because they need the alloy considered to be first prepared in glassy form, to be able to measure the glass transition temperature and/or the crystallization temperature. Therefore, many parameters have been proposed such as Gibbs free energy difference ÁG a-ss between amorphous phase and solid solutions phase, 10) melting enthalpy ÁH m , 11) a product of thermodynamic parameter (ÁH chem  S =k B ), 12) to predict GFA of alloy systems without the need of preparing them in glass form. Recently, some efforts have been made to search for GFA of alloy systems by the CALPHAD (Calculation of Phase Diagram) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%