2011
DOI: 10.21236/ada545786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging Systems for Computer-Aided Detection

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Litjens et al (2017) have performed a comprehensive-review of applications of deep learning to medical image analysis; their findings confirm that most researchers employ an intuition-based random search to optimize hyper-parameters. Finally, a few authors have also sought to optimize acquisition or reconstruction parameters in order to optimize CAD performance (Lau, 2011;Lee et al, 2017). For instance, Lau (2011) developed realistic phantoms to optimize image acquisition parameters and therefore, indirectly, CAD results.In this work, we have assumed the imaging system and reconstruction algorithm to be fixed, which is the most realistic scenario for CAD development both in industry and academia wherever images are acquired by a commercial scanner in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litjens et al (2017) have performed a comprehensive-review of applications of deep learning to medical image analysis; their findings confirm that most researchers employ an intuition-based random search to optimize hyper-parameters. Finally, a few authors have also sought to optimize acquisition or reconstruction parameters in order to optimize CAD performance (Lau, 2011;Lee et al, 2017). For instance, Lau (2011) developed realistic phantoms to optimize image acquisition parameters and therefore, indirectly, CAD results.In this work, we have assumed the imaging system and reconstruction algorithm to be fixed, which is the most realistic scenario for CAD development both in industry and academia wherever images are acquired by a commercial scanner in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing times of 14 min were reported. Investigators have computed scatter point-spread functions (spsf) (Yang et al , 2014; Lau, 2012; Diaz et al , 2014) to study the nature of scatter in DM and DBT. (Zhao et al , 2015) developed a spsf-based patient specific SC method for CBCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%