2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of biostimulant for bioremediation of contaminated coastal sediment by response surface methodology (RSM) and evaluation of microbial diversity by pyrosequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that the optimized biogas production for solutions 1, 2 and 3 are higher than experimental ones by 8.19%, 6.60% and 10.67%, respectively. For the results to be valid, the difference between the actual value and the predicted value should be less than 20% [50]. The differences are within the range hence the optimization is admissible.…”
Section: Verification Of Optimized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be observed that the optimized biogas production for solutions 1, 2 and 3 are higher than experimental ones by 8.19%, 6.60% and 10.67%, respectively. For the results to be valid, the difference between the actual value and the predicted value should be less than 20% [50]. The differences are within the range hence the optimization is admissible.…”
Section: Verification Of Optimized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The predicted R 2 value of 0.7442 showed reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 value of 0.9364. The threshold is that the difference between the adjusted R 2 and the predicted R 2 should be less than 0.2 [50]. The difference here is 0.1922.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variance (Anova)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The p -value of 0.015 for X 1 X 2 also implied the interaction was happened between F/I ratio and organic loading. The R 2 value of 0.9558 implied more than 95.58% of the variance was attributable to the variables in methane production (Subha et al 2015). Coefficient of variation (C.V. %) described the dispersion of the data and represented the accuracy and credibility of the result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of all the terms for variables was tested statistically at level of p  = 0.05. The best condition for the experiment, the influence of individual variable, and the interaction between variables on the response were described by 2D contour plots and 3D response surface plots (Subha et al 2015). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%