2006
DOI: 10.2113/jeeg11.3.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Array Configurations and Panel Combinations for the Detection and Imaging of Abandoned Mineshafts using 3D Cross-Hole Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Abstract: Cross-borehole electrical resistivity tomography was used to detect and image a concealed air-filled mineshaft at a greenfield test site. The measurement configurations and panel combinations were selected using a two-stage optimization process. An optimal set of array configurations was selected for each cross-borehole panel on the basis of the model resolution matrix. Subsequently, various combinations of panels were tested with synthetic and field data to determine the effects of coverage and data density o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
25

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
34
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement scheme comprised many sets of four-electrode measurements, in which the current flow and potential measurements are crosshole. In general, these provide better signal-to-noise characteristics and greater image resolution than configurations with in-hole current flow and potential measurements (Bing and Greenhalgh, 2000;Wilkinson et al, 2006;. To provide sufficient image resolution in crosshole ERT, it is important that the aspect ratio of the panel (borehole spacing / depth) is < 0.75 (LaBrecque et al, 1996).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement scheme comprised many sets of four-electrode measurements, in which the current flow and potential measurements are crosshole. In general, these provide better signal-to-noise characteristics and greater image resolution than configurations with in-hole current flow and potential measurements (Bing and Greenhalgh, 2000;Wilkinson et al, 2006;. To provide sufficient image resolution in crosshole ERT, it is important that the aspect ratio of the panel (borehole spacing / depth) is < 0.75 (LaBrecque et al, 1996).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of surveys carried out with electrodes on the ground surface decreases rapidly with depth. Cross-borehole surveys have been carried out to improve the resolution across the entire depth range of interest (Slater et al 2000;Wilkinson et al 2006a;Chambers et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many significant developments in algorithms to automatically select arrays to maximize the resolution of the inversion model for linear surface arrays and cross-borehole surveys (Stummer et al 2004;Wilkinson et al 2006aWilkinson et al , 2006bLoke et al 2010a;Nenna et al 2011;Hagrey 2012). A non-linear method that calculates the model resolution (the 'Compare R' method) by Wilkinson et al (2006b) proved to be the best method (Loke et al 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in very complex areas, the 2-D inversion model can suffer from artefacts due to structures outside the survey line (Johansson et al, 2007). A 3-D survey and inversion model is required to obtain sufficiently accurate results (Wilkinson et al, 2006;Chambers et al, 2006;Legault et al, 2008). In some areas, repeated 3-D surveys are carried out to detect temporal changes of the subsurface (Rosqvist et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%