1993
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/14.7.1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an HPLC method for analyses of 32P-postlabeled DNA adducts

Abstract: A further development of an HPLC method to analyze 32P-postlabeled DNA adducts is presented. The method is based on on-line detection of 32P radioactivity after separation by reversed-phase chromatography. The method has an advantage in that the postlabeling mixture can be injected directly into the HPLC system without any prior purification, with the background radioactivity on a low level. The analysis includes the whole range of substances from orthophosphate to non-polar DNA adducts, which makes it possibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies with mammals suggest that coupling 32P-postlabeling with HPLC improves the ability to characterize individual adducts (24). In addition, using immunoaffinity chromatography and HPLC coupled with either UV detection (25) or 3 P-postlabeling (26) has provided greater specificity in identification of individual carcinogen-DNA adducts.…”
Section: Analytic Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies with mammals suggest that coupling 32P-postlabeling with HPLC improves the ability to characterize individual adducts (24). In addition, using immunoaffinity chromatography and HPLC coupled with either UV detection (25) or 3 P-postlabeling (26) has provided greater specificity in identification of individual carcinogen-DNA adducts.…”
Section: Analytic Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation of 32 P-postlabeled DNA adducts could be achieved by TLC (Randerath et al 1981), a combination of TLC and HPLC (Weyand et al 1987;Talaska et al 1990;Pfau and Phillips 1991), or by 32 P-HPLC with online detection of 32 P radioactivity (Mo¨ller et al 1993). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the 32 P-TLC method might be insufficient in the assessment of carcinogenic potential of different complex petroleum products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common chromatographic method in postlabeling has been TLC (thin-layer chromatography) but the more recently developed 32 P-HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) method has shown several advantages, such as better resolution of complex mixtures of DNA adducts, a faster analytical answer, better chromatographic reproducibility, and reduced exposure to radioactivity (Mo¨ller et al 1993;Koskinen et al 1997). The ability of 32 P-HPLC to analyze DNA adducts from a wide range of compounds has been reported (Zeisig and Mo¨ller 1997;Zeisig et al 1999) as well as the ability to analyze DNA adducts from complex mixtures such as petroleum products (Akkineni et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of all enzymes and chemicals have been earlier described (Mo¨ller et al 1993). All solvents and salts were of analytical grade and all water used was run through a MilliQPLUS system (Millipore, Milford, Mass., USA).…”
Section: Subjects and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%