2014
DOI: 10.1177/1077546314547532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an engine mounting system with consideration of frequency-dependent stiffness and loss factor

Abstract: An engine mounting system is the primary vibration isolator of the engine from the chassis. The frequency-dependent stiffness and loss factor present a more accurate representation of a rubber mount as opposed to the frequencyindependent damping model. In this article, dynamic optimization of an engine mounting system considering the frequency-dependent stiffness and loss factor is presented. The dynamic properties in all three principal directions are measured on the basis of the optimum locations and orienta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental validation was not been carried out during their studies. Lin et al (2005) and Ooi et al (2014) were conducted experiment study to evaluate frequency dependent stiffness and frequency dependent lost factor of rubber mount by using impact technique [8] [9]. However, the authors were not focused on non-linear region small force excitation was applied in the studied and linear region behavior is assumed in the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental validation was not been carried out during their studies. Lin et al (2005) and Ooi et al (2014) were conducted experiment study to evaluate frequency dependent stiffness and frequency dependent lost factor of rubber mount by using impact technique [8] [9]. However, the authors were not focused on non-linear region small force excitation was applied in the studied and linear region behavior is assumed in the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the PMS used in the optimization process was simplified as a 6-DOF rigid model with time-invariant inertial property, 4,7,13,34 as shown in Figure 1(a). A right-hand powertrain coordinate system (PCS) o p X p Y p Z p is defined.…”
Section: Overview Of the Truck System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the flexibility of the chassis frame is omitted or not well addressed in these models. The engines of heavy-duty trucks, especially the engines having low idle speed, usually have significant vibration below 100 Hz, 12,13 ; it would excite the lower order modes of the frame. In addition, the lighter weight of the chassis frame and heavier loading capacity of the trucks would make the frame having more dynamic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies in the literature for the minimization of the vibration transmissibility of the powertrain mount by integrating the rigid body models and the design optimization tools. For example, various optimization techniques such as sequential quadratic programming for the mount locations and orientations are employed to minimize the vertical force transmitted [18,19]. In the studies, which are based on the optimal placement of the frequencies of rigid body modes, powertrain modes are decoupled from each other where the location and orientation of the powertrain mounts are chosen as design parameters [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%