The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an “area to point” heat conduction problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An overwhelming majority of the designs from the intensive study on the volumeto-point problem are hence tree-like, independent of whether the design approaches are targeted at tree structures or not. Remarks like "it can be seen that the design results resemble natural tree networks" can be found in related literature [1,9,12,19,22,24], implying that tree structures have been accepted as the optimal topologies of volume-to-point structures. However, the study in this paper shows that lamellar needle-like structures instead of tree structures are the true optimal topologies for volume-to-point structures in the context of steady-state heat conduction for minimum thermal compliance and minimum maximum temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An overwhelming majority of the designs from the intensive study on the volumeto-point problem are hence tree-like, independent of whether the design approaches are targeted at tree structures or not. Remarks like "it can be seen that the design results resemble natural tree networks" can be found in related literature [1,9,12,19,22,24], implying that tree structures have been accepted as the optimal topologies of volume-to-point structures. However, the study in this paper shows that lamellar needle-like structures instead of tree structures are the true optimal topologies for volume-to-point structures in the context of steady-state heat conduction for minimum thermal compliance and minimum maximum temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the extensive literature on this problem, different parameters are used as the metric for the heat conduction performance and different design approaches are proposed, as summarized in Table 1. [18] Entropy generation TO Temperature gradientbased principle [19] T max , T av TO Genetic algorithm [20,21] Temperature gradient difference TO Cellular automaton [22] T av Generative approach Growth algorithm [23] Generative approach Space colonization algorithm and genetic algorithm [24] T max Generative approach Genetic algorithm [25] Tmax : maximum temperature, Tav : average temperature, C th : thermal compliance, Ein : interface energy, TO: topology optimization, SIMP: Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization model, SSM: Stiffness Spreading Method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, design of a specific fin on the basis of the minimum entropy generation [17] results in different configurations compared to those obtained by the classical optimization methods [16]. This is also true when one is applying the concept of entropy generation to optimize the temperature field in electronic devices [18]. These types of thermodynamic analyses, i.e., the entropy generation and exergy analyses of a system, have been interestingly further extended to exergetic analysis of the human body [19] [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various constructal designs have been derived for volume (area)‐to‐point problems with different constraints, boundary conditions, element shapes, and optimization objectives. [ 3–11 ] Many algorithms, eg, the solid isotropic with material penalization (SIMP) method, [ 12–18 ] rational approximation of material properties method, [ 19 ] evolutionary structural optimization method, [ 20,21 ] level‐set method, [ 22–24 ] cellular automaton algorithm, [ 25,26 ] deep learning approach, [ 27 ] genetic algorithm (GA), [ 28,29 ] simulated annealing (SA), [ 28,30 ] PSO, [ 31 ] bionic optimization, [ 30,32–41 ] and calculus of variations, [ 42,43 ] have been applied to the field of volume (area)‐to‐point heat conduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%