2018
DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2018-0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a Treatment System of Wastewater Streams for Electrochemical Cr(VI) Reduction: Selective versus Centralized Treatment

Abstract: The problem of the optimization of selective treatment systems of wastewater streams contaminated with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is investigated. In order to comply with the Mexican environmental norm of Cr(VI) for treated wastewater streams at minimum cost, a nonlinear programming (NLP) model for the electrochemical reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium was developed. The model incorporates a variable reaction rate, which is a function of the Cr(VI) concentration and the electrical current… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of effluents of different concentrations and flows, increases the pollutant concentrations in the more diluted streams increasing the treatment costs. In contrast, distributed or decentralized treatment systems allow to treat contaminated effluents separately and more selectively, reducing thus the effluent flows to be treated, and consequently the costs of the treatment system (Wang et al, 1994;Gálan et al, 1999;Zamora et al, 2004;López-Yañez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of effluents of different concentrations and flows, increases the pollutant concentrations in the more diluted streams increasing the treatment costs. In contrast, distributed or decentralized treatment systems allow to treat contaminated effluents separately and more selectively, reducing thus the effluent flows to be treated, and consequently the costs of the treatment system (Wang et al, 1994;Gálan et al, 1999;Zamora et al, 2004;López-Yañez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%