Abstract:Solid lipid nanoparticle (SLNs) formulae were utilized for the release of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) inside the colonic medium for local treatment of colon cancer. SLNs were prepared by double emulsion-solvent evaporation technique (w/o/w) using triglyceride esters, Dynasan™ 114 or Dynasan™ 118 along with soyalecithin as the lipid parts. Different formulation parameters; including type of Dynasan, soyalicithin:Dynasan ratio, drug:total lipid ratio, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) concentration were studied with respect … Show more
“…The total amount of drug released was similar for PCL/FU tablets manufactured using the lower and higher laser powers and are associated with small differences presented by both condition in the sintering degree and porosity. This drug release pattern is very common with FU polymeric drug delivery systems and has been reported by many researchers [31][32][33]. The initial amount of FU released by the sintered PCL/FU tablets is a desirable profile to provide a high initial concentration of the drug locally in the cancer cells following implantation.…”
In this study, implantable polycaprolactone/fluorouracil tablets were additively manufactured by selective laser sintering using different laser power levels. PCL/FU tablets showed on SEM-EDS small particles of fluorouracil dispersed on the surface and into the porous PCL matrix. The crystallinity values for the PCL/FU tablets were lower than for the pure PCL tablets, probably due to interaction of the FU particles with the polymer chains during the solidification process. The PCL/FU tablets prepared using the higher laser power (7 W) had the highest flexural modulus, probably due to better PCL particle coalescence, higher sinter degree and the dispersion of FU particles in the co-continuous porous PCL matrix. Initially the PCL/FU tablets provided a rapid release of a high concentration of the drug at the site of the cancer cells and a subsequent controlled release sustaining levels of the chemotherapeutic agent in the region of the tumor. This 2-stage release of the drug can be a desirable profile in cartilage cancer treatment.
“…The total amount of drug released was similar for PCL/FU tablets manufactured using the lower and higher laser powers and are associated with small differences presented by both condition in the sintering degree and porosity. This drug release pattern is very common with FU polymeric drug delivery systems and has been reported by many researchers [31][32][33]. The initial amount of FU released by the sintered PCL/FU tablets is a desirable profile to provide a high initial concentration of the drug locally in the cancer cells following implantation.…”
In this study, implantable polycaprolactone/fluorouracil tablets were additively manufactured by selective laser sintering using different laser power levels. PCL/FU tablets showed on SEM-EDS small particles of fluorouracil dispersed on the surface and into the porous PCL matrix. The crystallinity values for the PCL/FU tablets were lower than for the pure PCL tablets, probably due to interaction of the FU particles with the polymer chains during the solidification process. The PCL/FU tablets prepared using the higher laser power (7 W) had the highest flexural modulus, probably due to better PCL particle coalescence, higher sinter degree and the dispersion of FU particles in the co-continuous porous PCL matrix. Initially the PCL/FU tablets provided a rapid release of a high concentration of the drug at the site of the cancer cells and a subsequent controlled release sustaining levels of the chemotherapeutic agent in the region of the tumor. This 2-stage release of the drug can be a desirable profile in cartilage cancer treatment.
“…The association of 5-FU molecules with nanocarriers has yielded diverse results against colon cancer cell lines (37)(38)(39)(40). For instance, Jain and Jain (41) demonstrated that chitosan NPs coupled to hyaluronic acid and loaded with 5-FU can moderately (2.6 times) increase the drug's cytotoxicity to HT-29 colon cancer cells.…”
ABSTRACT. The clinical use of 5-fluorouracil, one of the drugs of choice in colon cancer therapy, is limited by a nonuniform oral absorption, a short plasma half-life, and by the development of drug resistances by malignant cells. We hypothesized that the formulation of biodegradable nanocarriers for the efficient delivery of this antitumor drug may improve its therapeutic effect against advanced or recurrent colon cancer. Hence, we have engineered two 5-fluorouracil-loaded nanoparticulate systems based on the biodegradable polymers poly(butylcyanoacrylate) and poly(ε-caprolactone). Drug incorporation to the nanosystems was accomplished by entrapment (encapsulation/dispersion) within the polymeric network during nanoparticle synthesis, i.e., by anionic polymerization of the monomer and interfacial polymer disposition, respectively. Main factors determining 5-fluorouracil incorporation within the polymeric nanomatrices were investigated. These nanocarriers were characterized by high drug entrapment efficiencies and sustained drug-release profiles. In vitro studies using human and murine colon cancer cell lines demonstrated that both types of nanocarriers significantly increased the antiproliferative effect of the encapsulated drug. In addition, both nanoformulations produced in vivo an intense tumor growth inhibition and increased the mice survival rate, being the greater tumor volume reduction obtained when using the poly(ε-caprolactone)-based formulation. These results suggest that these nanocarriers may improve the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil and could be used against advanced or recurrent colon cancer.
“…Higher number of likely charged nanoparticles repels each other and creates an electrostatic repulsive force and maintains the nanoparticles in Brownian motion, which is expected to overcome the van der walls attractive force arising from induced dipole-dipole interaction between nanoparticles and gravitational force, thereby stabilize the nanoformulation by preventing the agglomeration. Nanoparticles with zeta potentials <±20 mV are have limited stability [20,21]. Analysis of variance has shown that the process parameters has significant effect (Prob> F, <0.0001) on zeta potential (Table 5).…”
Section: Effect Of Process Parameters On the Zeta Potentialmentioning
The present study was aimed to develop dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate based nanoparticulate drug delivery system using nanoprecipitation method and optimize the process parameters using PlackettBurman factorial design to yield least average particle size and narrow sized particle distribution without filtration or centrifugation process. Twelve experimental runs involving 11 process parameters at higher and lower levels were generated using Design-Expert. Factorial design result has shown that (a) Except stirring duration all other process parameters significantly influence the average particle size; (B) Except β-cyclodextrin concentration, aqueous phase volume and organic phase volume, all other process parameters significantly influence the polydispersity index; and (C) Except polymer concentration and poloxamer 407 concentration, all other process parameters do not significantly influence the zeta potential. The average particle size, polydispersity index and zeta potential of the prepared dual drug loaded nanoparticles were well within acceptable limits and found to be in the range of 47 to 87 nm, 0.14 to 0.28 and 22 to 39 mV, respectively. Surface morphology examination has shown that the prepared nanoparticles were spherical in shape. The developed dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate based nanoparticulate drug delivery system can be routinely used to fabricate narrow sized polymeric nanoparticles without filtration or centrifugation process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.