2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization design of arch dam shape with modified complex method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, upstream and downstream ends of the three segments are joined by circular arcs that define the correspondent faces of the central cantilever, as shown in Figure 3. Other criteria can be adopted such as adjusting polynomials of second order as functions of the height [7,9,10]. These approaches are related to theoretical optimization models and involve the use of additional parameters.…”
Section: Crown Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, upstream and downstream ends of the three segments are joined by circular arcs that define the correspondent faces of the central cantilever, as shown in Figure 3. Other criteria can be adopted such as adjusting polynomials of second order as functions of the height [7,9,10]. These approaches are related to theoretical optimization models and involve the use of additional parameters.…”
Section: Crown Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arch dams have also been considered for shape optimization, as reflected in the existing bibliography [8][9][10]. Particular emphasis has been placed on the search of optimal crown cantilever shapes and horizontal arches curvature, through different mathematical problem formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid increase of computer capacity, the computer-aided engineering design became the standard technique for design and optimization modelling of arch dams. The optimization process of the dam geometry and structural parameters is carried out until the dam optimal design satisfies the allowable design criteria [1][2][3][4]. The software accuracy and capacity to carry out complex structural and sensitivity analyses and fine-tuning of the dam geometry contribute to the effectiveness of the final dam shape [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the concrete volume of the arch dam optimized by the proposed cubic spline was less than the original design scheme optimized using parabolic shape. Li et al [24] used the modi ed complex method which can search for the optimal solution directly, has no special request on the condition of the objective function and constraint function, and does not need to derivate during iteration pilot calculation. Fanelli [25] showed that the degrees of freedom, which are strictly necessary to be considered in the shape optimization procedure of an arch dam, can be reduced by a judicious choice of basic model and design variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%