2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization-based reactive power control in HVDC-connected wind power plants

Abstract: One application of high–voltage dc (HVdc) systems is the connection of remotely located offshore wind power plants (WPPs). In these systems, the offshore WPP grid and the synchronous main grid operate in decoupled mode, and the onshore HVdc converter fulfills the grid code requirements of the main grid. Thus, the offshore grid can be operated independently during normal conditions by the offshore HVdc converter and the connected wind turbines. In general, it is well known that optimized reactive power allocati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The converter loss can be approximated by a quadratic function depending on the converter current (in p.u.) [21],…”
Section: B Power Losses Of Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The converter loss can be approximated by a quadratic function depending on the converter current (in p.u.) [21],…”
Section: B Power Losses Of Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], the voltage reference of the pilot bus was determined by the offline optimal power flow calculation and the total reactive power reference was obtained using a PI controller and then dispatched to each WTG. In [21]- [23], the objectives of the OPF were the power loss of the OWF collector system, grid side converter (GSC) of WTGs and HVDC converters. Since the VSC-HVDC transmission system decouples the OWFs from the onshore AC grid, the main control aim for OWFs is to maintain the terminal voltage of each WTG within the feasible range [16], which was not considered in these OPF-based strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the DFIGs, the modeling and control to the shunt capacitors and the SVCs are easier, since they do not have the wind turbine (WT) and the generator. The PMSG is also easier than the DFIG due to the var decoupling by the B2B converters . There are already papers about var control and optimization to them, although using the simplified description of the WT without the generator and B2B converters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMSG is also easier than the DFIG due to the var decoupling by the B2B converters. [9][10][11][12] There are already papers about var control and optimization to them, although using the simplified description of the WT without the generator and B2B converters. [13][14][15] For the DFIG-basedfarm, there are papers dispatching its total reactive power from system level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactive power is required due to loaded generators and transmission lines [2]. The technique of reactive power generation at loadside is called compensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%