Given these strengths, sampling for and detecting eDNA using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have gained popularity over the past 20 years (Dejean et al., 2012;Moyer et al., 2014) and are now broadly used to sample and indirectly infer the presence of taxa in a variety of aquatic environments. However, widespread sampling and detection of eDNA by ecologists and conservation biologists are unstandardized, and the field is in need of standards for statistical analysis and reporting (Fediajevaite et al., 2021;Thalinger et al., 2021). In addition, managers need context to understand the biological significance of a set of eDNA observations. This paper describes how probability statements about species presence can be developed using the artemis package and an eDNA sampling scheme.
| Estimating [eDNA] via qPCRIn eDNA samples that undergo fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR, the amount of eDNA present in the sample is estimated from the number of quantification cycles of qPCR (hereafter the "Cq" value) completed before amplification takes place during qPCR. By this process, the concentration of eDNA is not directly measured. The relationship between eDNA concentration ([eDNA]) and Cq values is determined via a standard curve generated in the laboratory from the assay for the target species. This standard curve formula typically takes the form: