2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and validation of a fast amplification protocol for AmpFlSTR® Profiler Plus® for rapid forensic human identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been demonstrated previously [1,5], percent stutter increases using each of the fast PCR protocols, as compared to that of standard PCR. However, use of a 20% global stutter filter or modification of the locus specific stutter thresholds in GeneMapper® ID should prevent excessive stutter peaks from being called by the software, which has already been demon Average percent stutter (n-4), pull-up and -A are displayed, as well as average number of detected stutter (n-4), pull-up, -A, low-level NSA and elevated baseline per profile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As has been demonstrated previously [1,5], percent stutter increases using each of the fast PCR protocols, as compared to that of standard PCR. However, use of a 20% global stutter filter or modification of the locus specific stutter thresholds in GeneMapper® ID should prevent excessive stutter peaks from being called by the software, which has already been demon Average percent stutter (n-4), pull-up and -A are displayed, as well as average number of detected stutter (n-4), pull-up, -A, low-level NSA and elevated baseline per profile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Fast PCR and/or direct PCR are fairly recent improvements from the late 2000s/early 2010s that can be utilized by the forensic DNA community to reduce processing time and/or costs for forensic-type and reference samples [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Reduced volume PCR amplification has been shown to improve sensitivity and efficiency [11], but the more reduced the total reaction volume becomes, the more intra-locus peak balance decreases, making extremely low volume reactions likely unsuitable for anything other than single-source reference samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reducing amplification processing time has been a major focus for forensic DNA testing over the past 10 years, especially through the advent of fast PCR polymerases, direct PCR, and rapid DNA testing [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. But such a reduction in processing time has often been subject to an increase in cost due to reagents and/or equipment, and/or prone to a decrease in STR profile quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%