2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and prevalidation of the in vitro ERα CALUX method to test estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For determination of full dose-response curves of the test compounds (agonistic activity), CALUX ® cells (van der Burg et al, 2010) were seeded in 96 well plates in assay medium (DMEM/ F12 medium with charcoal stripped serum and supplemented with non-essential amino-acids) at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h the cells were exposed in triplicate for another 24 h with dilution series of the pure compounds (ZEN, α-and β-ZAL, α-and β-ZEL: 0.05 pM -0.5 μM; DMSO: 0.1% and E2: highest concentration 0.1 nM as reference compound).…”
Section: Erα Chemical Activated Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay (Caluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determination of full dose-response curves of the test compounds (agonistic activity), CALUX ® cells (van der Burg et al, 2010) were seeded in 96 well plates in assay medium (DMEM/ F12 medium with charcoal stripped serum and supplemented with non-essential amino-acids) at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h the cells were exposed in triplicate for another 24 h with dilution series of the pure compounds (ZEN, α-and β-ZAL, α-and β-ZEL: 0.05 pM -0.5 μM; DMSO: 0.1% and E2: highest concentration 0.1 nM as reference compound).…”
Section: Erα Chemical Activated Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay (Caluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the individual test level negative scores were much more frequent, again showing specificity or responses at the thresholds set. In addition, the ERalpha-and AR CALUX test have already been shown to give negative results with all negative controls that were included in validation panels of chemicals selected by ECVAM [7,8] and in the case of the ERalpha CALUX, the OECD [10].…”
Section: Performance Of Individual Assays and Plausibility Of Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important element in our approach was to start with the use of assays that are well underway of being accepted as alternatives to animal experiments, and build up the screening battery from there. This involved the use of receptor based reporter gene assays, such as CALUX ® assays for androgenic and estrogenic compounds that are evaluated in an ECVAM/OECD guided validation effort [6][7][8][9]. We expect that inclusion of validated tests in the core of a screening battery can pave the way for a growing platform to which new mechanism-based assays can be included when knowledge increases, possibly even without going through the entire process of time consuming validation, because the basic technology for each assay is the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selecting tests to be included in the battery, methods were preferred that were either validated or in the process of being validated, including the EST test [33], the zebrafish embryo test [34], and reporter gene assays for estrogens [35,36] and androgens [37]. The ERalpha-and AR CALUX assay already were prevalidated in the context of the ReProTect FP6 program, and subsequently have been this issue to EURL-ECVAM and OECD to allow formal validation, and regulatory acceptance [35,36,38,39]. Since our battery of tests of reporter gene assays is very comparable to these latter tests, the validated tests may be used as "validation anchors" in a screening battery, i.e.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%