2020
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2019.2898616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and Implementation of the Proportional-Resonant Controller for Grid-Connected Inverter With Significant Computation Delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the current controller compares reference and measured values of the converter output current and it obtains the modulating signal for the converter switching by means of another PR controller with k P-PR = 20 and k R-PR = 2000. The voltage and the current PR controller coefficients were both tuned by means of the guidelines provided in [30]. Figure 3 depicts these control loops, where u ci is the measured voltage signal in the filter capacitor of the ith converter and i L1 is the current in the inverter-side reactance of the LCL filter.…”
Section: Power Converter Inner Voltage and Current Control Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the current controller compares reference and measured values of the converter output current and it obtains the modulating signal for the converter switching by means of another PR controller with k P-PR = 20 and k R-PR = 2000. The voltage and the current PR controller coefficients were both tuned by means of the guidelines provided in [30]. Figure 3 depicts these control loops, where u ci is the measured voltage signal in the filter capacitor of the ith converter and i L1 is the current in the inverter-side reactance of the LCL filter.…”
Section: Power Converter Inner Voltage and Current Control Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation signal enabled the switching signals for the gates in the DC/AC converter by means of a sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) technique. In this figure, i out is the measured output current, and k P and k R (20 and 2000 are the respective values, tuning guidelines for PR controllers can be found in [34]) are the controller constants.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Nanogridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this figure, iout is the measured output current, and kP and kR (20 and 2000 are the respective values, tuning guidelines for PR controllers can be found in [34]) are the controller constants.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Nanogridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis [19], predictive [20,21] and dead beat controller [22][23][24] types belong to the first controller's group, presenting high robustness and fast dynamic response. On the other hand, linear current controllers such as proportional-integral (PI) based, PR based or repetitive controller based have been successfully used [25][26][27][28]. The PR controller, first proposed in [26], is quite a simple and attractive solution in the case of abc-naturally or αβ-stationary reference implementation frames because it can overcome two well-known drawbacks of the conventional PI controller: Inability to track a sinusoidal reference with zero steady-state error and poor disturbance rejection capability.…”
Section: Voltage Source Operation Of the Output Invertermentioning
confidence: 99%