2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and evaluation of viral metagenomic amplification and sequencing procedures toward a genome-level resolution of the human fecal DNA virome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b). The substantial higher level of Microviridae viruses in the viral samples may because that the VLP technology is more inclined to target free viral particles, agreeing with the previous studies 6,35 .…”
Section: Gut Virome Profiling and Sex-and Age-related Variationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4b). The substantial higher level of Microviridae viruses in the viral samples may because that the VLP technology is more inclined to target free viral particles, agreeing with the previous studies 6,35 .…”
Section: Gut Virome Profiling and Sex-and Age-related Variationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We performed an integrated homology- and feature-based pipeline to identify viral sequences based on our previously developed methodologies 7, 39, 60, 61 . In brief, we first removed assembled contigs whose prokaryotic genes were over half of their genes and ten times greater than the number of viral genes based on CheckV (v0.7.0) 22 assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only contigs of ≥5 kb in length were used to identify viral sequences in each sample. The identification, decontamination, and dereplication of viral sequences were performed according to the prior studies ( 20 , 47 49 ). Briefly, the assembled contigs underwent a stringent quality assessment as follows: (i) contigs were classified as viral if their viral gene content surpassed that of microbial genes, as determined by CheckV v0.7.0 ( 25 ); (ii) contigs exhibiting a P value of less than 0.01 and a score exceeding 0.90 in DeepVirFinder v1.0 ( 50 ); and (iii) identification as viral sequences by VIBRANT v1.2.1 ( 51 ) using default settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the rapid development of metagenomics sequencing and analyzing technology has already characterized a vast array of novel phages that cannot be identified with the traditional culturing-based approaches [ 7 ]. Several evaluating strategies have been explored to optimize the amplifying, sequencing, and assembling methods for metavirome investigations, and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology has been broadly applied for the clinical diagnostics of infectious diseases and the precise surveillance of newly emerged pathogenic viruses [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Benler et al identified 3738 complete phage genomes which represented 451 putative genera and thousands of previously unknown phage taxa by searching the circular contigs that encoded phage hallmark genes in human gut metagenomes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%