2011
DOI: 10.1080/08927020903483304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising the platinum–carbon bond in nitrogen-doped single-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are dependent on which dopant is employed as each element affects the local bonding in the surface in a unique way. The results given for the undoped and nitrogen-doped systems reported here are very different from those presented in our previous works; however, the trend remains unchanged. , Changing the basis set can have a profound effect on the magnitude of the result, as demonstrated in a work by Bühl et al The different functional and basis set combinations considered in this study on 25 third-row transition-metal complexes showed that the Lanl2DZ basis set was inferior to SDD based on the standard deviation of 41 metal–ligand distances. Lanl2DZ is a compact basis set, whereas SDD is more flexible, which decreases the variability in the metal–ligand distance.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are dependent on which dopant is employed as each element affects the local bonding in the surface in a unique way. The results given for the undoped and nitrogen-doped systems reported here are very different from those presented in our previous works; however, the trend remains unchanged. , Changing the basis set can have a profound effect on the magnitude of the result, as demonstrated in a work by Bühl et al The different functional and basis set combinations considered in this study on 25 third-row transition-metal complexes showed that the Lanl2DZ basis set was inferior to SDD based on the standard deviation of 41 metal–ligand distances. Lanl2DZ is a compact basis set, whereas SDD is more flexible, which decreases the variability in the metal–ligand distance.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Dunning 51 showed, while optimizing the structure of a single water molecule, that different basis set contractions can lead to a ground-state difference of as much as 0.99 eV. The binding energy between the Pt atom and the undoped graphene flake measured with Lanl2MB was −1.975 eV, 8 whereas using Lanl2DZ, it was −1.27 eV. 5 The differences between those two results and the undoped case here can be due to the change in basis set for the lighter elements (STO-3G for Lanl2MB, D95 V for Lanl2DZ, and 6-31G(d) in this work), as well as the difference in the effective core potential used.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, a good communication between theoreticians and experimentalists is absolutely necessary to resolve an important question of improved ORR activity of 1-D NCNSs.As the functionalization of NCNSs by metals is rather important for practical applications, there are a number of theoretical studies covering this area. Adsorption of Al[606], Pd[607], Pt[608,609] was investigated. Also, systematic studies of transition metals adsorption on SWNCNTs are available[610][611][612].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%