2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-0545-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising the detection of upper motor neuron function dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Abstract: Evidence of upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction is essential in making the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Central motor conduction (CMC) abnormalities detected using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are presumed to reflect UMN dysfunction. CMC is, however, often normal in patients with classical sporadic ALS. The aim of the study was to determine whether the utility of the CMC measure in ALS could be enhanced. We measured CMC to four pairs of muscles (abductor digiti minimi (ADM), bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity of the MEP latencies from lateral and medial M1 area, the similarity of latencies with normative values in the published literature (25,26,32), and the small variability of these latencies favor a mono-synaptic corticospinal projection from both the medial and lateral M1 (22,23). TMS has been reported to activate oligosynaptic pathways as well, such as corticoreticulospinal and corticopropriospinal projections (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similarity of the MEP latencies from lateral and medial M1 area, the similarity of latencies with normative values in the published literature (25,26,32), and the small variability of these latencies favor a mono-synaptic corticospinal projection from both the medial and lateral M1 (22,23). TMS has been reported to activate oligosynaptic pathways as well, such as corticoreticulospinal and corticopropriospinal projections (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…3). The latencies of the MEPs in the targeted foot muscle (AH) that were evoked by TMS over both the medial and the lateral hot spots were within the 95% confidence interval of reported latencies for this muscle (25)(26)(27). Within each subject, these laten- In Fü sslers S1-S3, activation in the precentral gyrus is significantly (P Ͻ 0.001 uncorrected) stronger for toe movements of the dominant (C) and nondominant (D) foot when contrasted with 9 control subjects (activation superimposed on the individual T1-weighted MR image of subject S1, z ϭ 66).…”
Section: Two M1 Foot Representations With Direct Output To Spinal Motormentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One of our most striking findings is that TMS was more sensitive than clinical examination in patients with suspected or possible ALS, revealing UMN dysfunction in 75% (9 of 12) of the upper limbs. The sensitivity of CMCT in supporting the diagnosis reportedly increases with the number of muscles studied, 10,12,14,35,38,40,47 and this may apply to the parameters studied herein. We believe that, as for electromyography, several regions of the body, including muscles innervated by bulbar nerves, should be tested to increase the sensitivity of TMS in supporting a diagnosis of ALS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a useful tool for diagnosing UMN dysfunction in ALS and provides a sensitive means of assessing cortical excitatory and inhibitory dysfunction. 10,12,14,35,38,40,47 The most frequently studied variables, which are generally recorded by conventional TMS using simple stimulation techniques, are central motor conduction time (CMCT), amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), resting motor threshold (RMT), and duration of silent period (SP). CMCT is reportedly not a sensitive variable for the diagnosis of ALS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques may provide evidence of UMN pathology in PLS and ALS, but may be more sensitive to the primary pathology in PLS than ALS [156][157][158][159]. These techniques may provide evidence of UMN pathology in PLS and ALS, but may be more sensitive to the primary pathology in PLS than ALS [156][157][158][159].…”
Section: Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%