2001
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.9.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising testing for phospholipid antibodies

Abstract: Aim-To compare anticardiolipin (ACL) and anti-2 glycoprotein 1 ( 2gp1) enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and to incorporate these results into a meta-analysis of published data. Method-Three representative commercial ACL ELISAs and an in house 2gp1 assay were optimised and then assessed on 124 sera from normal donors, patients with infection, or patients with APS. A Medline search was screened for papers meeting defined criteria to conduct a meta-an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…h 2 GPI constitutes the major antigenic target for aPL circulating in the serum of APS patients [6]; therefore, the term ''antiphospholipid antibodies'' is actually a misnomer. It is currently evident that the h 2 GPI ELISA has greater specificity and positive predictive value than the cardiolipin ELISA for the diagnosis of clinically significant APS [7,8]. These data confirmed previous experimental results on the role of h 2 GPI-dependent aPL in distinguishing between APS occurring in the setting of autoimmune diseases and the transient occurrence of aPL associated with infections [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…h 2 GPI constitutes the major antigenic target for aPL circulating in the serum of APS patients [6]; therefore, the term ''antiphospholipid antibodies'' is actually a misnomer. It is currently evident that the h 2 GPI ELISA has greater specificity and positive predictive value than the cardiolipin ELISA for the diagnosis of clinically significant APS [7,8]. These data confirmed previous experimental results on the role of h 2 GPI-dependent aPL in distinguishing between APS occurring in the setting of autoimmune diseases and the transient occurrence of aPL associated with infections [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Solid phase immunoassay is performed on human 132-GPl-coated plates, usually in the presence of bovine serum 132-glycoprotein I [6]. Although their presence is not currently i ncluded in the criteria for the APS [1], 132-GP1 antibody assays show higher precision and better correlation with the thromboembolic complieations in APS and SLE than assays for aCL and are less likely to show transient positive results in association with infection [46,47]. However, the problem of standardizatiDn remain.…”
Section: Anti-fl2-gtycoprotein 1 (Anti-fl2gp1) Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Human 132-glycoprotein 1 is a plasma glycoprotein that can actas a physiological anticoagulant, in vitro at least, inhibiting the clotting cascade and platelet aggregation [46]. 132-GP1 is required asa cofactor for the binding of aCL to cardiolipin in APS, but not in infection.…”
Section: Anti-fl2-gtycoprotein 1 (Anti-fl2gp1) Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partially prompted by this change, a number of APS experts have therefore recommended that the aCL test be completely abandoned and replaced by the anti-β2GPI test, in order to reduce the potential number of these false-positive (largely β2GPI independent) aCL test results [17,42]. However, while the anti-β2GPI assay is more specific for APS than the aCL assay (about 99% and 90%, respectively, according to Helbert et al [47]), this is at the expense of significantly lower sensitivity for APS (about 75% and over 95%, respectively, in the same study). In other words, a proportion of APS patients will be negative for anti-β2GPI even though they may be positive for aCL.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Aps Classification Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%