2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising sampling regimes and data collection to inform surveillance for trachoma control

Abstract: It is estimated that 190 million individuals are at risk of blindness from trachoma, and that control by mass drug administration (MDA) is reducing this risk in many populations. Programs are monitored using prevalence of follicular trachoma disease (TF) in children. However, as programs progress to low prevalence there are challenges interpreting this indirect measure of infection. PCR and sero-surveillance are being considered as complementary tools to monitor low-level transmission, but there are questions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model for C. trachomatis transmission is based on a previously described framework. 15 , 16 The original population-based, deterministic model based on ordinary differential equations has subsequently been adapted to be stochastic 14 and then further developed here to a fully stochastic individual-based model. The model incorporates current knowledge of the natural history and transmission of trachoma, including direct person-to-person transmission with infectivity proportional to an individual's bacterial load, children acting as a core group for transmission, individuals being susceptible to repeated infections and the persistence of TF after clearance of ocular C. trachomatis infection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model for C. trachomatis transmission is based on a previously described framework. 15 , 16 The original population-based, deterministic model based on ordinary differential equations has subsequently been adapted to be stochastic 14 and then further developed here to a fully stochastic individual-based model. The model incorporates current knowledge of the natural history and transmission of trachoma, including direct person-to-person transmission with infectivity proportional to an individual's bacterial load, children acting as a core group for transmission, individuals being susceptible to repeated infections and the persistence of TF after clearance of ocular C. trachomatis infection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 18 , 20 These aspects are represented within the model framework, with bacterial load, duration of ID and D for each individual assumed to decrease with each subsequent infection following negative exponentials. 14 , 16 Age, current infection/disease status and total number of infections for each individual are explicitly incorporated; the model runs in 1-wk time steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model for C. trachomatis transmission is based on a previously described framework, 13 which accounts for TF persisting after clearance of ocular C. trachomatis infection. Individuals transitioning through four sequential states: Susceptible (S), infected but not yet diseased (I), infected and diseased (ID) or diseased but no longer infected (D), illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the specifications of the original model and evidence from empirical studies, 2,12,13 duration of ID and D disease for each individual are assumed to decrease with each subsequent infection following a negative exponential; calculated durations for each infection are used as fixed transition periods in contrast to the exponential transitions utilised in previous models. 13,14…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further the cross-reactivity of the antibodies to multiple antigens, whether it be other filaria or in the case of trachoma, urogenital chlamydia, means that epidemiological context must be taken into account when determining serological cutoffs. There is potentially greater utility in using serology as an indicator of recent transmission dynamics [83] and for aiding the identification of areas at potential increased risk of recrudescence [65,71,72]. Serology is also a useful indicator as it can easily be integrated with the monitoring of other infectious diseases [12,84].…”
Section: Test For Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%