2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.02018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising Perceived Distortion in Lossy Encoding of Dynamic Meshes

Abstract: Development of geometry data compression techniques in the past years has been limited by the lack of a metric with proven correlation with human perception of mesh distortion. Many algorithms have been proposed, but usually the aim has been to minimise mean squared error, or some of its derivatives. In the field of dynamic mesh compression, the situation has changed with the recent proposal of the STED metric, which has been shown to capture the human perception of mesh distortion much better than previous me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the algorithm is based on similar ideas as [VS07] and [VP11], a significant gain in the compression performance is due to both the proposed application of the geometric Laplacian and the mesh averaging technique. The geometric Laplacian substantially reduces the redundancy in differential coordinates over the sequence.…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the algorithm is based on similar ideas as [VS07] and [VP11], a significant gain in the compression performance is due to both the proposed application of the geometric Laplacian and the mesh averaging technique. The geometric Laplacian substantially reduces the redundancy in differential coordinates over the sequence.…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric Laplacian substantially reduces the redundancy in differential coordinates over the sequence. However, in order to build the geometric Laplacian, our technique requires to explicitly encode the average mesh, while [VP11] does not require to store any additional data, since it employs a purely combinatorial Laplacian that can be recovered from connectivity only. A further improvement in the compression performance is achieved by means of the proposed differential coordinates predictor.…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations