Optimising metadata to make high‐value content more accessible to Google users

Abstract

This paper shows how information in digital collections that have been catalogued using highquality metadata can be retrieved more easily by users of search engines such as Google. The research and proposals described arose from an investigation into the observed phenomenon that pages from the Glasgow Digital Library (gdl.cdlr.strath.ac.uk) were regularly appearing near the top of Google search results shortly after publication, without any deliberate effort to achieve this. The reasons for this phenomenon are now well understood and are described in the second part of the paper. The first part provides context with a review of the impact of Google and a summary of recent initiatives by commercial publishers to make their content more visible to search engines.The literature research provides firm evidence of a trend amongst publishers to ensure that their online content is indexed by Google, in recognition of its popularity with Internet users. The practical research demonstrates how search engine accessibility can be compatible with use of established collection management principles and high-quality metadata.The concept of data shoogling is introduced, involving some simple techniques for metadata optimisation. Details of its practical application are given, to illustrate how those working in academic, cultural and public-sector organisations could make their digital collections more easily accessible via search engines, without compromising any existing standards and practices.

In Search of Search Engine Marketing Strategy Amongst SME’s in Ireland

“…Some of these include: providing keyword rich Website content throughout all Web pages (Seda, 2004;Schultz and Fristedt, 2005;Dawson and Hamilton, 2006); using keywords in the title and description meta tags in the Website code (Zhang and Dimitroff, 2005); and keeping the likes of flash, graphics, forms and frames to a minimum (Schultz and Fristedt, 2005;Dawson and Hamilton, 2006). Mentz and Whiteside (2003), Oliva (2004), Seda (2004), and Schultz and Fristedt (2005) recommend a link development strategy whereby other good quality and relevant Websites are used to develop or implement a link back to the company Website.…”

Open access dissemination challenges: a case study

“…The existence of search engines is ignored or denigrated." (Dawson and Hamilton 2006) Search engines are the primary means of discovering and selecting digital content (Dawson 2004). The prominence of Google and other search engines among searchers has been noted, as well as increased collaboration between information providers and Google (Tenopir 2004).…”

Optimising Publications for Google Users

“…As well as enhancing usability and speed of access, chunking content by chapter or section allows title tags to be varied to include the titles of chapters or sections, along with the title of the overall work. This aspect of metadata optimisation is a significant aid to resource discovery via Google, as has been demonstrated by Dawson &Hamilton (2005). The process can be automated for large-scale publication of structured documents, so that it becomes highly cost-effective, although the mechanism for doing this varies according to context and is beyond the scope of this article.…”