Abstract:There are potent evidence-based psychological treatments for youth with mental health needs, yet they are rarely implemented in clinical practice, especially for youth with mental health disorders in the context of chronic physical illness such as epilepsy. Implementation science, the study of the translation of research into practice, can promote the uptake of existing effective interventions in routine clinical practice and aid the sustainable integration of psychological treatments with routine health care.… Show more
“…One solution is the improvement of neurology and psychiatry residency programs with expanded curricula covering neurologic aspects of psychiatric disorders and vice versa to reduce this competency‐related barrier 13 . In relation to psychologists, there has also been recognition that some specialist training may be needed for the optimal delivery and tailoring of psychological interventions for PWE 35–37 . For instance, it has been recommended that mental health professionals, especially those working in medical settings, should have basic knowledge about epilepsy and psychological interventions should ideally be implemented by professionals in direct contact with the medical epilepsy specialists treating the patients 10,34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In relation to psychologists, there has also been recognition that some specialist training may be needed for the optimal delivery and tailoring of psychological interventions for PWE. [35][36][37] For instance, it has been recommended that mental health professionals, especially those working in medical settings, should have basic knowledge about epilepsy and psychological interventions should ideally be implemented by professionals in direct contact with the medical epilepsy specialists treating the patients. 10,34 In addition, it is recommended that psychological interventions are modified to accommodate common cognitive difficulties common in PWE, 37 including the use of written handouts.…”
Summary
Objectives
The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers’ current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients.
Methods
A voluntary 27‐item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists.
Results
Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents’ patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%).
Significance
The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.
“…One solution is the improvement of neurology and psychiatry residency programs with expanded curricula covering neurologic aspects of psychiatric disorders and vice versa to reduce this competency‐related barrier 13 . In relation to psychologists, there has also been recognition that some specialist training may be needed for the optimal delivery and tailoring of psychological interventions for PWE 35–37 . For instance, it has been recommended that mental health professionals, especially those working in medical settings, should have basic knowledge about epilepsy and psychological interventions should ideally be implemented by professionals in direct contact with the medical epilepsy specialists treating the patients 10,34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In relation to psychologists, there has also been recognition that some specialist training may be needed for the optimal delivery and tailoring of psychological interventions for PWE. [35][36][37] For instance, it has been recommended that mental health professionals, especially those working in medical settings, should have basic knowledge about epilepsy and psychological interventions should ideally be implemented by professionals in direct contact with the medical epilepsy specialists treating the patients. 10,34 In addition, it is recommended that psychological interventions are modified to accommodate common cognitive difficulties common in PWE, 37 including the use of written handouts.…”
Summary
Objectives
The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers’ current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients.
Methods
A voluntary 27‐item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists.
Results
Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents’ patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%).
Significance
The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.
“…Epilepsy-relevant content was integrated throughout the treatment, such as epilepsy-related examples in worksheets. The epilepsy materials were developed and finalised in earlier stages of the programme of research [ 24 ].…”
Background
Mental health disorders in the context of long-term conditions in children and young people are currently overlooked and undertreated. Evidence-based psychological treatments for common childhood mental health disorders (anxiety, depression and disruptive behaviour disorders) have not been systematically evaluated in young people with epilepsy despite their high prevalence in this population. The aim of this multi-site randomised controlled trial is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adding a modular psychological intervention to usual care for the mental health disorders in comparison to assessment-enhanced usual care alone.
Methods
In total, 334 participants aged 3–18 years attending epilepsy services will be screened for mental health disorders with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the diagnostic Development and Wellbeing Assessment (DAWBA). Those identified as having a mental health disorder and consenting to the trial will be randomised to either receive up to 22 sessions of the modular psychological intervention (MATCH-ADTC) delivered over the telephone over 6 months by non-mental health professionals in addition to usual care or to assessment-enhanced usual care alone. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-randomisation. It is hypothesised that MATCH-ADTC plus usual care will be superior to assessment-enhanced usual care in improving emotional and behavioural symptoms. The primary outcome is the SDQ reported by parents at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include parent-reported mental health measures such as the Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale, quality of life measures such as the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory and physical health measures such as the Hague Seizure Severity Scale. Outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. Qualitative process evaluations and a health economic evaluation will also be completed.
Discussion
This trial aims to determine whether a systematic and integrated approach to the identification and treatment of mental health disorders in children and young people with epilepsy is clinically and cost-effective. The findings will contribute to policies and practice with regard to addressing mental health needs in children and young people with other long-term conditions.
Trial registration
ISRCTN ISRCTN57823197. Registered on 25 February 2019.
“…Increased recognition and early treatment of emotional and behavioural difficulties in children with genetic disorders can be supplemented by understanding and researching any distinctive patterns or features which may occur in this population. Current evidence suggests that standard mental health treatments need little or no modification for special populations (Shafran et al, 2020); however robust outcome studies are required.…”
Children with genetic conditions may experience significant mental health difficulties such as anxiety and challenging behaviour. However, understanding of the feasibility and effectiveness of psychological interventions for emotional and behavioural problems in the context of genetic conditions is limited. Low-intensity psychological interventions have demonstrated promise in paediatric populations and may be able to address their mental health difficulties. A case series design was used to assess the feasibility of low-intensity interventions for emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and young people with genetic conditions recruited from a mental health drop-in centre at a tertiary hospital. Participants received seven weekly sessions with a trained practitioner. The intervention was based on existing modular treatments and evidence-based self-help materials. Feasibility and treatment satisfaction were assessed, as well as measures of symptoms of anxiety and challenging behaviour, treatment goals and quality of life, at baseline, during treatment and 6-month follow-up. Five participants received treatment for challenging behaviour, one for anxiety, and one for obsessive compulsive disorder. All participants completed treatment. Clinically significant change in the SDQ Total score was found in three participants. All participants demonstrated progress in goals and symptoms of emotional and behavioural difficulties over the course of treatment. Low-intensity psychological interventions for emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and young people with genetic conditions is feasible, acceptable and potentially beneficial. Further research is warranted to examine the effectiveness of the intervention and its use in clinical paediatric settings.
Key learning aims
(1)
To gain a basic understanding of low-intensity psychological intervention in children and young people with genetic conditions.
(2)
To enhance understanding of the practicalities and acceptability of delivering low-intensity psychological intervention to children and young people with genetic conditions and co-morbid emotional and behavioural difficulties.
(3)
To learn about the potential clinical benefits of delivering low-intensity psychological intervention to children and young people with genetic conditions in the context of stepped care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.