2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimised asset replacement strategy in the presence of lead time uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In this paper, we consider alternative options that are renewed and repeated inde…nitely. In the asset replacement literature, Richardson et al (2013) model replacement as in…nitely repeated options complicated by lead time uncertainty, but not involving any choice between alternatives. Ye (1990) and Mauer and Ott (1995) analyze in…nitely repeated replacement options for alternative equipments whose productivity is constant over time but whose maintenance and operation cost follows a Brownian motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In this paper, we consider alternative options that are renewed and repeated inde…nitely. In the asset replacement literature, Richardson et al (2013) model replacement as in…nitely repeated options complicated by lead time uncertainty, but not involving any choice between alternatives. Ye (1990) and Mauer and Ott (1995) analyze in…nitely repeated replacement options for alternative equipments whose productivity is constant over time but whose maintenance and operation cost follows a Brownian motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCC minimisation keeps the cost of the function or activity throughout the life of the mine as low as possible. Whereas the cost of operations tends to remain more-or-less constant, maintenance costs are volatile, and increase with the age of the asset [2]. Thus maintenance costs are more important than operating costs in LCC analyses.…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Minimisation To Determine the Optimum Replacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richardson et al [2] (echoed by Emblemsevåg [7]) found that, even today, most LCCs are deterministic and unable to accommodate uncertainty, which is a major limitation. Few sources in the literature have found practical applications for stochastic quantitative AB-LCC analyses, and they were not applied with great consistency.…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Minimisation To Determine the Optimum Replacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the impact of uncertainty on the replacement policy is of primary importance (Mercier, 2008, Nguyen et al, 2013, Richardson et al, 2013.We leave these issues for a future study.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%