2002
DOI: 10.1007/s001700200021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation Technique for Face Milling Stainless Steel with Multiple Performance Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical experimental design methods are overly complex and not easy to apply. Additionally, when the number of machining parameters increases a large number of experiments are required [15]. Therefore, the factors instigating variations should be determined and checked under laboratory environments.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical experimental design methods are overly complex and not easy to apply. Additionally, when the number of machining parameters increases a large number of experiments are required [15]. Therefore, the factors instigating variations should be determined and checked under laboratory environments.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the highest speed, lowest feed rate and highest radial rake angle of the cutting conditions scale, the GA technique recommends the best minimum surface roughness value. For end milling also, to modeling surface roughness different tools are used like RSM (Alauddin et al 1996;Mansour and Abdalla 2002;Wang and Chang 2004;Oktem et al 2005;Reddy and Rao 2005;Reddy and Rao 2006b;Routara et al 2009), Taguchi analysis (Yang and Chen 2001;Lin 2002;Ghani et al 2004;Bagci and Aykut 2006), ANN (Tsai et al 1999;Balic and Korosec 2002;Benardos and Vosniakos 2002;El-Sonbaty et al 2008;Öktem 2009;Zain et al 2010b). From the literature survey, it is seen that most of literatures deal with conventional roughness parameters to describe surface roughness and also in the study, three machining parameters viz.…”
Section: Review Of Roughness Study In Machiningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…presented a method for the simulation of surface roughness of the machined surface in high-speed end milling. Lin (2002) has optimized cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut with consideration of multiple performance characteristics including removed volume, surface roughness and burr height in face milling of stainless steel and shown that the most influence of the cutting parameters is the feed rate. Mansour and Abdalla (2002) have concluded that with increase in feed rate or in axial depth of cut, surface roughness increases whilst with increase in cutting speed, surface roughness decreases in end milling operations of EN32 materials.…”
Section: Review Of Roughness Study In Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step No.1: Normalizing or data preprocessing would be the initial step conducted to normalize (transforming measured units into dimensionless parameters) the test results on the scale of zero and one due to the series of the degree of the process factors are different (Cavaliere et al 2008;Lin 2002). In this grey relational generating step, initial series are changed into a collection of comparable series.…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysis (Gra)mentioning
confidence: 99%