2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42493-019-00028-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of the Capriccio Method to Couple Particle- and Continuum-Based Simulations of Polymers

Abstract: In this paper, we thoroughly develop strategies to improve the Capriccio method, which is a very promising numerical tool for multiscale simulations of amorphous polymers and polymer composites. It is a coupling technique that uses a partitioneddomain approach to link regions of high resolution, i.e. at the atomistic or molecular level, with a surrounding continuum description. We discuss in detail the differences between the Capriccio method in its original implementation (Pfaller et al. in Comput Methods App… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 22 compares the force histories of the MD-simulation and an optimized FE-model containing a single Maxwell element. The resulting material parameters are reasonable and add up to an instantaneous stiffness of c0=E+c1=809.80.166667emMPa, which is close to the values we have determined elsewhere [10,28,42]. All error values er stated below to quantify the quality of the calibration are computed as the Euclidean norm of the difference between the MD goal and FE optimum vectors, divided by the number of data points in the goal, e.g., er=1377FxMDFxFE2.…”
Section: Exemplary Calibration Of Continuum Mechanical Constitutivsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 22 compares the force histories of the MD-simulation and an optimized FE-model containing a single Maxwell element. The resulting material parameters are reasonable and add up to an instantaneous stiffness of c0=E+c1=809.80.166667emMPa, which is close to the values we have determined elsewhere [10,28,42]. All error values er stated below to quantify the quality of the calibration are computed as the Euclidean norm of the difference between the MD goal and FE optimum vectors, divided by the number of data points in the goal, e.g., er=1377FxMDFxFE2.…”
Section: Exemplary Calibration Of Continuum Mechanical Constitutivsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, such material laws are particularly needed in partitioned-domain multiscale techniques, like the Capriccio method introduced by Pfaller et al [9,28,42], but are also a necessity to correlate findings from MD simulations with those obtained from continuum mechanical computations and experimental evidence. Beyond this, developing and adjusting MD models focusing on their capability to reproduce mechanical material properties require a tool as presented here.…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough overview of these atomistic-to-continuum coupling strategies can be found in [51]. Based on the preceding methods, Pfaller et al introduced the CAPRICCIO method [61,62,63,64,65,66,67] for the treatment of amorphous polymers, which we discuss in more detail in Section 2.1.…”
Section: Numerical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we combine the advantages of particle-based and continuum methods in a concurrent multiscale approach called the Capriccio method, which is specifically designed to model and investigate amorphous polymers and nanocomposites. The method was introduced by Pfaller et al [1,2,3] and has been optimized and extended since then [4,5]. The Capriccio method has been successfully employed to gain insights into mechanical interphases in polymeric nanocomposites [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%